This stock comparison examines ITT Inc. and RBC Bearings Incorporated, two prominent players in engineered components for transportation, industrial, and aerospace markets. Both benefit from rising demand in infrastructure and defense sectors amid recent economic shifts. Traders seeking momentum in industrials or investors eyeing relative performance in diversified manufacturing will find value here. By analyzing recent earnings, price trends, and market positioning, this review highlights contrasts in growth drivers and risk profiles to inform stock comparison decisions in today's environment.
ITT Inc. manufactures engineered critical components and customized technology solutions across three segments: Motion Technologies (brake pads, shock absorbers), Industrial Process (pumps, valves), and Connect & Control Technologies (connectors for aerospace). Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, ITT serves transportation, energy, and chemical markets globally.
In recent market activity, ITT shares traded around $206, down modestly from a 52-week high of $225 amid broader industrials volatility. Q1 2026 results showcased 33% total revenue growth to $1.21 billion and 11% organic expansion, fueled by the SPX FLOW acquisition and market share gains in friction materials and connectors. Adjusted EPS rose 25% to $1.98, surpassing estimates, with full-year guidance at $7.70-$8.00 adjusted EPS. Sentiment remains positive on operational momentum, though integration costs and higher interest tempered gains. YTD returns stand at 19%, outpacing the S&P 500.
RBC Bearings Incorporated designs, manufactures, and markets precision bearings, seals, and precision components primarily for aerospace, defense, and industrial applications. The company focuses on high-performance products for severe-duty environments, serving commercial aviation, oil & gas, and semiconductor sectors.
Recent weeks saw RBC shares near $606, reflecting YTD gains of 35% and 66% over one year, buoyed by aerospace recovery and industrials strength. Trading near 52-week highs around $632, the stock outperformed peers with 10% three-month returns. Anticipation builds for Q1 2026 earnings on May 15, following a history of beating estimates by 5.3% average. Revenue TTM at $1.79 billion supports profitability with 15% margins. Positive momentum stems from defense demand and supply chain resilience, though valuation premiums introduce caution in volatile conditions.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 high-performing AI trading bots chosen from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers. These bots excel in current market conditions, delivering annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70 across sectors like semiconductors, industrials, space, and leveraged ETFs. Strategies vary from trend-following on 5-60 minute timeframes to multi-agent portfolios with take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3%/2%), adapting to volatility in stocks like NVDA, ETN, and ASTS. Explore these bots for diverse styles, from short-term swings to longer holds, and consider subscribing to copy their signals for potential outperformance.
ITT and RBC share exposure to aerospace and industrials but diverge in business models: ITT's diversified segments provide revenue stability via pumps and connectors, contrasting RBC's specialized bearings focus yielding higher margins (15%) but cyclicality tied to aviation. Growth drivers favor ITT's recent M&A (mergers and acquisitions, deals combining companies), boosting scale, while RBC leverages organic aerospace aftermarket demand.
Recent momentum shows RBC's steadier climb (35% YTD) versus ITT's post-earnings dip (-6% one-month), though ITT's 45% one-year return edges ahead. Risk factors include ITT's acquisition debt versus RBC's premium P/E around 71. Sector-wise, both tap defense tailwinds, but ITT's energy exposure hedges industrials slowdowns. Market sentiment tilts toward RBC's consistency amid volatility, while ITT appeals for transformation upside—trade-offs in diversification versus specialization define positioning.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors RBC Bearings for its trend consistency, superior YTD momentum (35% vs. ITT's 19%), and proximity to highs amid aerospace catalysts. RBC's history of earnings beats and lower recent volatility suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance, though ITT's growth trajectory post-acquisition warrants monitoring for relative strength.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ITT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ITT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ITT (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while RBC (@Tools & Hardware) price change was +4.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.59%.
ITT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
RBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (+1.77% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| ITT | RBC | ITT / RBC | |
| Capitalization | 17.8B | 20.4B | 87% |
| EBITDA | 860M | 548M | 157% |
| Gain YTD | 15.289 | 43.998 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.14 | 71.04 | 49% |
| Revenue | 4.24B | 1.87B | 226% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 57.3M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.97B | 991M | 400% |
ITT | RBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ITT's Valuation (62) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (84) in the null industry. This means that ITT’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ITT (18) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to ITT’s over the last 12 months.
ITT's SMR Rating (65) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (75) in the null industry. This means that ITT’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ITT (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to ITT’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as ITT (23) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to ITT’s over the last 12 months.
| ITT | RBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 23 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITT has been closely correlated with RBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ITT jumps, then RBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITT | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| RBC - ITT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TKR - ITT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ATMU - ITT | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| FSS - ITT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SPXC - ITT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.