Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM) are prominent players in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) sector, providing design, assembly, and supply chain solutions for industries like AI infrastructure, cloud computing, defense, and medical devices. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, growth drivers, and positioning amid rising demand for advanced electronics. Traders seeking exposure to technology supply chains and investors evaluating EMS relative performance will find insights into momentum, valuation, and sector catalysts in the current environment.
Jabil Inc. (JBL) is a global leader in engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain services, operating across regulated industries, intelligent infrastructure, and connected living segments. The company designs and produces electronic hardware, embedded software, and systems for 5G, cloud data centers, automotive, healthcare, and digital commerce applications. In recent market activity, JBL shares have surged, trading near 52-week highs around $342 with year-to-date gains exceeding 50% and one-year returns over 130%. Positive sentiment stems from analyst upgrades to Strong Buy, driven by favorable earnings revisions and collaborations in AI data centers, alongside strong data center revenue growth. Key metrics include a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 46, market cap of $36 billion, and ROE (return on equity) of 60%, reflecting efficient capital use despite elevated debt levels.
Sanmina Corporation (SANM) delivers integrated manufacturing solutions, including product design, assembly, logistics, and after-market services for OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) in industrial, medical, defense, aerospace, automotive, communications, and cloud infrastructure sectors. It produces components like printed circuit boards, cable assemblies, and storage platforms. Recently, SANM shares have climbed to around $185, posting year-to-date returns of 23% and one-year gains of 130%, amid anticipation for Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings. Performance reflects revenue surges from integrated manufacturing solutions, though guidance has occasionally lagged forecasts; highlights include 59% quarterly revenue growth year-over-year. Valuation shows a trailing P/E of 44, market cap of $10 billion, and ROE of nearly 10%, with lower debt/equity at 89% compared to peers.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading dips in industrials, trend-following in semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, LRCX, SOXL), and multi-agent approaches in aerospace/defense and energy, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance stats impress: annualized returns range from +15.5% to +177.85%, win rates 48%–88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in top cases. Tailored to current market conditions like AI/semiconductor booms and volatility, they offer real-time signals with risk management for copy trading. Professional traders can explore these bots to align strategies with EMS sector dynamics.
Both JBL and SANM thrive in EMS, focusing on complex assemblies for high-growth areas, but JBL’s scale provides broader diversification into AI servers and 5G, while SANM emphasizes defense/aerospace and medical stability. Growth drivers differ: JBL leverages data center momentum (52% YoY revenue jump in segments), versus SANM’s 59% quarterly surges amid supply chain resilience. Recent momentum favors JBL with 121% 12-month returns over SANM’s 84%, though both trade at high P/E ratios around 44–46. Risk factors include JBL’s higher debt/equity (329%) and beta (1.16), contrasting SANM’s lower leverage (89%) and beta (1.05); market sentiment tilts toward JBL via upgrades, while SANM faces earnings scrutiny.
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor JBL over SANM, citing superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, analyst upgrades, and stronger positioning in AI-driven infrastructure growth. While SANM offers value in defense stability and revenue acceleration, JBL’s catalysts suggest higher probability of near-term upside in volatile markets.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JBL’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
JBL (@Electronic Components) experienced а +5.96% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.46%.
JBL is expected to report earnings on Jun 17, 2026.
SANM is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| JBL | SANM | JBL / SANM | |
| Capitalization | 40.7B | 13.9B | 293% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | 571M | 348% |
| Gain YTD | 69.212 | 73.339 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.97 | 55.11 | 94% |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 11.3B | 289% |
| Total Cash | 1.06B | 1.58B | 67% |
| Total Debt | 4.39B | 2.17B | 202% |
JBL | SANM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 28 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SANM's Valuation (55) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (78). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (7). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (68). This means that JBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (35). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.
SANM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (29). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.
| JBL | SANM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JBL has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JBL jumps, then FN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| FN - JBL | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.02% | ||
| TTMI - JBL | 62% Loosely correlated | +6.47% | ||
| PLXS - JBL | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| KN - JBL | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| TEL - JBL | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SANM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANM | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| BHE - SANM | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| PLXS - SANM | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TTMI - SANM | 51% Loosely correlated | +6.47% | ||
| JBL - SANM | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| FLEX - SANM | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||