JBL
Price
$385.63
Change
+$0.81 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
40.68B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SANM
Price
$259.82
Change
+$4.62 (+1.81%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.94B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JBL vs SANM

Header iconJBL vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts JBL vs SANMBanner chart's image
JBL vs SANM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs. Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • JBL has delivered superior year-to-date returns of approximately 50%, outpacing SANM's 23%, driven by robust AI infrastructure demand.
  • Analysts recently upgraded JBL to Strong Buy amid positive earnings revisions and AI data center collaborations.
  • Both companies operate in electronics manufacturing services (EMS), benefiting from sector tailwinds in cloud computing and semiconductors, but JBL boasts a larger market cap of $36 billion versus SANM's $10 billion.
  • SANM shows strong quarterly revenue growth of 59% year-over-year, supported by defense and medical segments.
  • Over the past year, JBL returned 135% compared to SANM's 130%, highlighting competitive momentum in recent market activity.
  • Tickeron’s AI trading bots favor strategies in related sectors like semiconductors and industrials, offering tools for relative performance analysis.

Introduction

Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM) are prominent players in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) sector, providing design, assembly, and supply chain solutions for industries like AI infrastructure, cloud computing, defense, and medical devices. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, growth drivers, and positioning amid rising demand for advanced electronics. Traders seeking exposure to technology supply chains and investors evaluating EMS relative performance will find insights into momentum, valuation, and sector catalysts in the current environment.

JBL Overview and Recent Performance

Jabil Inc. (JBL) is a global leader in engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain services, operating across regulated industries, intelligent infrastructure, and connected living segments. The company designs and produces electronic hardware, embedded software, and systems for 5G, cloud data centers, automotive, healthcare, and digital commerce applications. In recent market activity, JBL shares have surged, trading near 52-week highs around $342 with year-to-date gains exceeding 50% and one-year returns over 130%. Positive sentiment stems from analyst upgrades to Strong Buy, driven by favorable earnings revisions and collaborations in AI data centers, alongside strong data center revenue growth. Key metrics include a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 46, market cap of $36 billion, and ROE (return on equity) of 60%, reflecting efficient capital use despite elevated debt levels.

SANM Overview and Recent Performance

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) delivers integrated manufacturing solutions, including product design, assembly, logistics, and after-market services for OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) in industrial, medical, defense, aerospace, automotive, communications, and cloud infrastructure sectors. It produces components like printed circuit boards, cable assemblies, and storage platforms. Recently, SANM shares have climbed to around $185, posting year-to-date returns of 23% and one-year gains of 130%, amid anticipation for Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings. Performance reflects revenue surges from integrated manufacturing solutions, though guidance has occasionally lagged forecasts; highlights include 59% quarterly revenue growth year-over-year. Valuation shows a trailing P/E of 44, market cap of $10 billion, and ROE of nearly 10%, with lower debt/equity at 89% compared to peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading dips in industrials, trend-following in semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, LRCX, SOXL), and multi-agent approaches in aerospace/defense and energy, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance stats impress: annualized returns range from +15.5% to +177.85%, win rates 48%–88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in top cases. Tailored to current market conditions like AI/semiconductor booms and volatility, they offer real-time signals with risk management for copy trading. Professional traders can explore these bots to align strategies with EMS sector dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both JBL and SANM thrive in EMS, focusing on complex assemblies for high-growth areas, but JBL’s scale provides broader diversification into AI servers and 5G, while SANM emphasizes defense/aerospace and medical stability. Growth drivers differ: JBL leverages data center momentum (52% YoY revenue jump in segments), versus SANM’s 59% quarterly surges amid supply chain resilience. Recent momentum favors JBL with 121% 12-month returns over SANM’s 84%, though both trade at high P/E ratios around 44–46. Risk factors include JBL’s higher debt/equity (329%) and beta (1.16), contrasting SANM’s lower leverage (89%) and beta (1.05); market sentiment tilts toward JBL via upgrades, while SANM faces earnings scrutiny.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor JBL over SANM, citing superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, analyst upgrades, and stronger positioning in AI-driven infrastructure growth. While SANM offers value in defense stability and revenue acceleration, JBL’s catalysts suggest higher probability of near-term upside in volatile markets.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
JBL vs. SANM commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBL is a Hold and SANM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (JBL: $385.63 vs. SANM: $260.13)
Brand notoriety: JBL and SANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JBL: 100% vs. SANM: 66%
Market capitalization -- JBL: $40.68B vs. SANM: $13.94B
JBL [@Electronic Components] is valued at $40.68B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $13.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $195.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $14.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JBL’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JBL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JBL is a better buy in the long-term than SANM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JBL is a better buy in the short-term than SANM.

Price Growth

JBL (@Electronic Components) experienced а +5.96% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

JBL is expected to report earnings on Jun 17, 2026.

SANM is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+4.72% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBL($40.7B) has a higher market cap than SANM($13.9B). SANM has higher P/E ratio than JBL: SANM (55.11) vs JBL (51.97). SANM YTD gains are higher at: 73.339 vs. JBL (69.212). JBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. SANM (571M). SANM has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. JBL (1.06B). SANM has less debt than JBL: SANM (2.17B) vs JBL (4.39B). JBL has higher revenues than SANM: JBL (32.7B) vs SANM (11.3B).
JBLSANMJBL / SANM
Capitalization40.7B13.9B293%
EBITDA1.99B571M348%
Gain YTD69.21273.33994%
P/E Ratio51.9755.1194%
Revenue32.7B11.3B289%
Total Cash1.06B1.58B67%
Total Debt4.39B2.17B202%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JBL vs SANM: Fundamental Ratings
JBL
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
1968
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a28

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SANM's Valuation (55) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (78). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (7). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (68). This means that JBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (35). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (29). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JBLSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SANM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LECO267.869.61
+3.72%
Lincoln Electric Holdings
AARD3.86-0.05
-1.15%
Aardvark Therapeutics Inc
TRMK45.17-0.74
-1.61%
Trustmark Corp
HBCP66.49-1.59
-2.34%
Home Bancorp
CCTG0.78-0.08
-9.36%
CCSC Technology International Holdings Limited

JBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JBL has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JBL jumps, then FN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBL
1D Price
Change %
JBL100%
+0.21%
FN - JBL
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.02%
TTMI - JBL
62%
Loosely correlated
+6.47%
PLXS - JBL
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KN - JBL
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
TEL - JBL
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
More

SANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANM
1D Price
Change %
SANM100%
+1.93%
BHE - SANM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
PLXS - SANM
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TTMI - SANM
51%
Loosely correlated
+6.47%
JBL - SANM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
FLEX - SANM
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More