Ad is loading...
KXIN
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.12 (-4.62%)
Updated
Nov 18, 03:26 PM (EDT)
TLF
Price
$4.08
Change
-$0.12 (-2.86%)
Updated
Nov 18, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

KXIN vs TLF

Header iconKXIN vs TLF Comparison
Open Charts KXIN vs TLFBanner chart's image
Kaixin Holdings
Price$2.48
Change-$0.12 (-4.62%)
Volume$125
CapitalizationN/A
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$4.08
Change-$0.12 (-2.86%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
KXIN vs TLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KXIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KXIN vs. TLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KXIN is a Hold and TLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (KXIN: $2.60 vs. TLF: $4.20)
Brand notoriety: KXIN and TLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KXIN: 57% vs. TLF: 32%
Market capitalization -- KXIN: $4.98M vs. TLF: $39.06M
KXIN [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.98M. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KXIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KXIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KXIN is a better buy in the long-term than TLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KXIN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KXIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

KXIN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -21.21% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

KXIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2022.

TLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.35% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than KXIN($4.98M). TLF has higher P/E ratio than KXIN: TLF (10.33) vs KXIN (0.03). TLF YTD gains are higher at: -1.408 vs. KXIN (-95.076). TLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.04M vs. KXIN (-81.83M). TLF has more cash in the bank: 12.2M vs. KXIN (54K). TLF (9.43M) and KXIN (9.74M) have identical debt. KXIN has higher revenues than TLF: KXIN (82.8M) vs TLF (76.2M).
KXINTLFKXIN / TLF
Capitalization4.98M39.1M13%
EBITDA-81.83M9.04M-906%
Gain YTD-95.076-1.4086,750%
P/E Ratio0.0310.330%
Revenue82.8M76.2M109%
Total Cash54K12.2M0%
Total Debt9.74M9.43M103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KXIN vs TLF: Fundamental Ratings
KXIN
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9778
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KXIN's Valuation (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TLF (54) in the null industry. This means that KXIN’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.

KXIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TLF (100) in the null industry. This means that KXIN’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as KXIN (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to KXIN’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KXIN (98) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KXIN’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as KXIN (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to KXIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KXIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KXIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSCLX14.58-0.03
-0.21%
DFA International Social Cor Eq Instl
WISIX12.28-0.04
-0.32%
William Blair International Sm Cap Gr I
UGMVX11.24-0.14
-1.23%
Victory Global Managed Volatility
FITGX19.76-0.27
-1.35%
Fidelity Advisor International Growth M
FSYCX9.41-0.13
-1.36%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq C

KXIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KXIN and NVVE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KXIN and NVVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KXIN
1D Price
Change %
KXIN100%
+4.00%
NVVE - KXIN
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
ZSHGY - KXIN
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABG - KXIN
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
KFS - KXIN
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
GME - KXIN
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and CANG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and CANG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
N/A
CANG - TLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
JZXN - TLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
SIEVF - TLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
ACVA - TLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
KXIN - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
More