LABU vs RGNX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABU is a Hold and RGNX is a StrongBuy.
RGNX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LABU | RGNX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIGDX | 14.32 | 0.21 | +1.49% |
| Federated Hermes International Growth IS | |||
| PRKCX | 6.59 | 0.09 | +1.38% |
| PGIM Real Estate Income C | |||
| FDIKX | 42.93 | 0.43 | +1.01% |
| Fidelity Diversified International K | |||
| MRBVX | 16.49 | 0.14 | +0.86% |
| BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value R | |||
| PMIRX | 10.19 | 0.06 | +0.59% |
| Putnam Multi-Asset Income R | |||
LABU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been closely correlated with NTLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then NTLA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LABU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LABU | 100% | +3.19% | ||
| NTLA - LABU | 78% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| BEAM - LABU | 74% Closely correlated | +4.51% | ||
| DNLI - LABU | 71% Closely correlated | +4.02% | ||
| VCYT - LABU | 68% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BCRX - LABU | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||
RGNX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGNX has been loosely correlated with AXON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGNX jumps, then AXON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGNX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGNX | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| AXON - RGNX | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| DNLI - RGNX | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.02% | ||
| BEAM - RGNX | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.51% | ||
| SANA - RGNX | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| XNCR - RGNX | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||