LAZ
Price
$38.53
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
May 1, 2:47 PM EST
MC
Price
$50.85
Change
+$1.77 (+3.61%)
Updated
May 1, 2:49 PM EST
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions LAZ vs MC

Header iconLAZ vs MC Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs MCBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$38.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$625
CapitalizationN/A
Moelis & Company
Price$50.85
Change+$1.77 (+3.61%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LAZ vs MC Comparison Chart

Loading...

LAZDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
LAZ vs. MC commentary
May 01, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Hold and MC is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2024
Stock price -- (LAZ: $38.50 vs. MC: $49.08)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 45% vs. MC: 108%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $3.66B vs. MC: $3.79B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.66B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAZ and MC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAZ is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.85% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -10.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17176.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 01, 2024.

MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.07% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LAZ with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) and LAZ($3.66B) have the same market capitalization . MC has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: MC (82.58) vs LAZ (16.44). LAZ YTD gains are higher at: 12.067 vs. MC (-11.619). LAZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.9M vs. MC (-32.04M). LAZ has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. MC (186M). MC has less debt than LAZ: MC (216M) vs LAZ (2.18B). LAZ has higher revenues than MC: LAZ (2.55B) vs MC (855M).
LAZMCLAZ / MC
Capitalization3.66B3.79B97%
EBITDA40.9M-32.04M-128%
Gain YTD12.067-11.619-104%
P/E Ratio16.4482.5820%
Revenue2.55B855M298%
Total Cash1.19B186M640%
Total Debt2.18B216M1,007%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5248
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (22). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (52). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (92) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (94). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (55). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (8). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAZDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHFHKD8.59N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Hong Kong Dollar
GBPEUR1.17N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Euro
JPYHKD0.05N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Hong Kong Dollar
XAUUSD2333.50N/A
N/A
Gold Ounce - United States Dollar
RMVIX25.26-0.44
-1.71%
RBC Microcap Value I