Advertisement
LEA vs SRI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lear Corporation (LEA) vs. Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LEA is a large, diversified global automotive supplier with strong recent earnings and rising margins, while SRI is a small-cap electronics specialist still working toward consistent profitability.
- Lear posted record-adjusted first-quarter EPS, whereas Stoneridge reported narrower losses supported by accelerating MirrorEye adoption.
- The two names differ sharply in scale: Lear generates roughly $23 billion in annual sales versus Stoneridge's guidance of $645–$670 million for 2026.
- Sentiment and risk profiles diverge, with LEA offering stability and shareholder returns and SRI carrying higher volatility and a restructuring-driven growth story.
- Relative performance and market positioning make this a useful contrast between an established industry leader and a turnaround candidate.
Introduction
Investors comparing LEA and SRI are weighing two very different profiles within the automotive supply chain. Both companies are Michigan-based and serve the global vehicle market, yet they operate at opposite ends of the size and maturity spectrum. This stock comparison is most relevant to investors deciding between a large, cash-generative supplier with a disciplined capital-return program and a smaller, higher-beta company refocusing its business around growth products. Understanding each company's recent performance, growth drivers, and risk factors can help clarify which aligns better with a given portfolio strategy.
LEA Overview and Recent Performance
Lear Corporation is the largest U.S.-based automotive supplier, headquartered in Southfield, Michigan, with businesses in Seating and E-Systems (electrical distribution and electronics). In recent quarters, LEA has delivered improved profitability even as global vehicle production declined. Its first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share rose 24% year over year to $3.87, the highest adjusted quarterly figure in several years, while net sales grew roughly 5% to $5.8 billion. Margins expanded in both segments, and free cash flow improved substantially, enabling continued share repurchases and a steady dividend. The company reaffirmed and later raised its full-year 2026 outlook. Sentiment has been supported by margin execution and new business wins, though analysts have noted cyclical exposure to tariffs, commodity costs, and slower electric-vehicle demand as key watchpoints.
SRI Overview and Recent Performance
Stoneridge, Inc. is a Novi, Michigan-based supplier of electronic systems for commercial and off-highway vehicles, best known for its MirrorEye camera-based mirror systems and electronics for driver information and connectivity. The company recently completed the sale of its Control Devices segment and brought in a new CEO, refocusing on higher-growth, higher-return businesses. Recent market activity reflects a turnaround narrative: first-quarter sales grew sequentially and adjusted gross margin expanded meaningfully, while second-quarter sales rose about 15% year over year and MirrorEye revenue climbed roughly 39%. SRI still reports net losses, but adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has improved, and management has targeted structural cost reductions. Its smaller market capitalization contributes to elevated volatility relative to larger peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and basket of stocks. With such a large universe of automated strategies, only the bots best suited to prevailing market conditions earn a place in Tickeron's curated Trending AI Robots section. This selection highlights strategies demonstrating consistent execution and alignment with current trends, giving traders a focused way to evaluate AI-driven approaches without sorting through the full catalog. If you are interested in how algorithmic systems are currently positioned across the market, explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest featured bots and their performance statistics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two stocks is scale and business model. LEA is a diversified, cash-flow-positive supplier spanning seating and electrical systems across passenger and commercial vehicles, with a mature margin profile and a disciplined buyback-and-dividend program. SRI is a focused electronics and vision-systems specialist concentrated in commercial and off-highway markets, where a single product line such as MirrorEye carries outsized influence on the growth story.
On growth drivers, Lear benefits from platform wins and content gains, while Stoneridge's thesis centers on MirrorEye penetration and new program awards. Risk factors also diverge: Lear faces broad exposure to global production volumes, tariffs, and commodity costs, whereas Stoneridge contends with execution risk, ongoing losses, a leveraged balance sheet, and higher beta (a measure of price volatility relative to the broader market). From a market sentiment standpoint, LEA trades at a modest valuation with a Hold-leaning analyst consensus, while SRI is viewed as a speculative turnaround with a smaller institutional following.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor LEA in the current environment. Lear demonstrates steadier earnings momentum, improving margins, positive free cash flow, and consistent shareholder returns—qualities that algorithmic models tend to weight favorably. SRI offers a potentially higher-upside, catalyst-driven story, but its ongoing losses, elevated volatility, and dependence on execution make its trend less stable by comparison. The assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive and should be read as one data point among many in a broader research process.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a StrongBuy and SRI is a Hold.
LEA in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026
LEA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 30 of 45 cases where LEA's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +4.18% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LEA advanced for three days, in 205 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LEA as a result. In 77 of 100 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for LEA turned negative on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.
LEA moved below its 50-day moving average on November 03, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LEA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for LEA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 42 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.050) is normal, around the industry mean (0.781). P/E Ratio (10.164) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.881). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.358) is also within normal values, averaging (1.494). Dividend Yield (0.028) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.271) is also within normal values, averaging (49.456).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LEA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LEA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
SRI's RSI Indicator is remaining in oversold zone for 1 day
It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SRI advanced for three days, in 208 of 296 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
SRI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 03, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SRI as a result. In 73 of 93 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for SRI turned negative on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 31 of the 41 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.
The 50-day moving average for SRI moved below the 200-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SRI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for SRI entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 25 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.954) is normal, around the industry mean (0.781). P/E Ratio (-1.166) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.881). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.050) is also within normal values, averaging (1.494). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.221) is also within normal values, averaging (49.456).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. SRI’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SRI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
LEA | SRI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SRI's Valuation (25) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (42). This means that SRI’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
SRI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (100). This means that SRI’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's SMR Rating (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as SRI (98). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to SRI’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as SRI (79). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to SRI’s over the last 12 months.
SRI's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (76). This means that SRI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.
| LEA | SRI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SRI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LEA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SRI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LEA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SRI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -6.89% price change this week, while SRI (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -12.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
LEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2027.
SRI is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.60% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
Advertisement
LEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEA | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| ADNT - LEA | 68% Closely correlated | -4.51% | ||
| MGA - LEA | 67% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| GNTX - LEA | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| DCH - LEA | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
| SMP - LEA | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
More | ||||
SRI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRI has been loosely correlated with MLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRI jumps, then MLR could also see price increases.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IIM | 11.47 | 0.28 | +2.50% |
| INVESCO VALUE Municipal Income TRUST | |||
| PBFB | 32.29 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) | |||
| ZJUN | 27.56 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) | |||
| PMOC | 26.46 | -0.11 | -0.41% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC) | |||
| IHI | 57.59 | -1.44 | -2.44% |
| iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) | |||