Advertisement
LHX vs NOC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? L3Harris Technologies (LHX) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- L3Harris Technologies (LHX) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) are leading defense contractors benefiting from sustained sector demand amid geopolitical tensions.
- NOC boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $82 billion compared to LHX's $60 billion, reflecting its scale in space and aeronautics.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks under pressure in a broader defense sector selloff, with NOC experiencing sharper declines post-earnings despite beats.
- LHX trades at a higher P/E ratio (price-to-earnings, around 38) versus NOC's more attractive 18, highlighting valuation contrasts.
- Analyst targets suggest meaningful upside for both, with LHX at $392 and NOC at $719, driven by backlogs and contracts.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight diverse trading opportunities in the sector through specialized bots.
Introduction
In the aerospace and defense sector, LHX and NOC stand out as key players providing critical technologies to government clients. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance drivers, and relative strengths amid heightened global security needs and fiscal scrutiny. Investors seeking exposure to defense spending trends, long-term contracts, and dividend stability will find value in evaluating these stocks' trajectories, business models, and responses to recent sector headwinds like budget concerns and earnings reactions.
LHX Overview and Recent Performance
L3Harris Technologies (LHX) specializes in integrated defense technologies, including tactical communications, electronic warfare, and missile systems. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around $320, reflecting resilience amid a defense sector pullback. Key influences include a $1 billion investment from the Department of Defense in its missile solutions business, bolstering growth prospects. Upcoming quarterly earnings are anticipated to show revenue growth of about 5.7% and EPS (earnings per share) expansion, supported by demand in communications and avionics. Sentiment remains positive with analyst upgrades and a consensus price target implying over 20% upside, though broader market rotations have capped near-term gains.
NOC Overview and Recent Performance
Northrop Grumman (NOC) focuses on advanced aircraft, space systems, and missile defense, with a massive $95 billion backlog. The stock, hovering near $575, has faced volatility in recent market activity, declining sharply after quarterly results that beat expectations but raised guidance concerns. A $207 million contract modification underscores ongoing demand, yet dependency on major programs like the B-21 bomber has pressured shares amid sector selloffs. Trading at a lower P/E multiple with a low beta (a measure of volatility relative to the market, at 0.05), NOC offers stability and a comparable dividend yield, with analysts forecasting solid upside potential.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available—specifically 25 selected out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across various markets. These bots employ diverse strategies, from short-term signal agents to long-term virtual portfolio managers and brokerage-integrated agents, with performance metrics highlighting win rates often exceeding 60%, average returns ranging from 20-50% annually in backtests, and trade frequencies from daily scalps to monthly swings. Suitable for current conditions like defense sector volatility, they adapt to momentum, value, and trend-following styles. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to automate strategies on stocks like LHX and NOC, potentially enhancing relative performance analysis.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both LHX and NOC thrive on U.S. defense budgets, but diverge in focus: LHX emphasizes communications and tactical systems, while NOC leads in space and strategic bombers. Growth drivers include NOC's larger backlog versus LHX's targeted investments. Recent momentum favors neither amid selloffs, with NOC showing post-earnings weakness despite beats. Risk factors involve program delays and appropriations risks, heightened for NOC due to scale. Sector exposure is similar, but LHX's higher beta signals greater sensitivity to market swings, contrasting NOC's stability. Sentiment tilts toward value in NOC, balanced by LHX's catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward NOC for its attractive valuation, low volatility, and substantial backlog providing earnings visibility. While LHX offers compelling growth via recent contracts, NOC's trend consistency and relative stability position it favorably in a cautious defense environment, with probabilistic upside from analyst targets.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHX is a Hold and NOC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LHX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LHX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LHX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LHX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
LHX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
NOC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-1.16% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| LHX | NOC | LHX / NOC | |
| Capitalization | 57.3B | 78.2B | 73% |
| EBITDA | 3.85B | 7.7B | 50% |
| Gain YTD | 5.635 | -2.751 | -205% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.42 | 17.25 | 194% |
| Revenue | 22.5B | 42.4B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 590M | 2.09B | 28% |
| Total Debt | 11.4B | 16.3B | 70% |
LHX | NOC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LHX's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (53) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (53) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
NOC's SMR Rating (34) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (76) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (60) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (69) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
| LHX | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 52% | 17 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
LHX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.