Advertisement
LHX vs NOC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? L3Harris Technologies (LHX) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LHX reported strong Q1 2026 results with 15% organic revenue growth and record backlog of $40.7 billion, supporting recent contract wins in space systems.
- NOC delivered Q1 earnings that beat estimates, though multiple analyst price target reductions occurred in recent weeks amid broader defense sector volatility.
- Both companies operate in the defense and aerospace sector, with exposure to government contracts, international sales, and large-scale programs that drive long-term visibility.
- LHX shares traded near $282 in mid-July 2026, showing relative stability compared with NOC price action around $520–$540.
- Sector sentiment has been influenced by ongoing geopolitical developments and U.S. defense spending priorities, affecting relative performance of both stocks in recent market activity.
- Upcoming Q2 earnings releases, particularly for LHX on July 29, 2026, represent near-term catalysts for both equities.
Introduction
L3Harris Technologies and Northrop Grumman are leading players in the aerospace and defense industry, each with substantial government contract portfolios and exposure to evolving national security priorities. This comparison examines their recent stock performance, business fundamentals, and market positioning to assist institutional and individual investors evaluating relative opportunities within the sector. Traders focused on momentum, earnings catalysts, or defense spending trends may find the analysis particularly relevant for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions.
LHX Overview and Recent Performance
L3Harris Technologies provides integrated mission solutions across communications, avionics, and space systems. In recent weeks, the company benefited from a major U.S. Space Force contract for advanced missile-tracking satellites, reinforcing its position in high-growth space programs. Q1 2026 financial results highlighted 12% revenue growth to $5.7 billion, 15% organic expansion, and a 33% rise in GAAP diluted EPS to $2.72, accompanied by a record backlog of $40.7 billion. Stock price behavior remained relatively stable near $282 in mid-July 2026, with year-to-date returns around 3%, reflecting measured investor response to execution strength amid broader market conditions.
NOC Overview and Recent Performance
Northrop Grumman delivers advanced aircraft, autonomous systems, and missile defense technologies under long-term government contracts. Recent market activity included several analyst price target adjustments downward, alongside positive developments such as NATO-related purchase interest. Q1 2026 earnings exceeded expectations, though share price volatility persisted with levels trading in the $520–$540 range during mid-July. The stock has faced pressure from sector-wide sentiment shifts, resulting in more pronounced movements compared with peers, while maintaining a consensus analyst Buy rating with an average target near $669.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from a universe of hundreds that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent risk-adjusted returns, and robust statistical profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, with performance metrics, win rates, and drawdown statistics varying widely to suit different investor preferences. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed strategy comparisons and live performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
L3Harris Technologies emphasizes communications and space payloads with a growing international revenue component, while Northrop Grumman concentrates on manned and autonomous platforms with deeper exposure to certain missile and aircraft programs. Recent momentum favors LHX on the back of stronger organic growth and backlog expansion, contrasting with NOC’s more variable price action following target revisions. Both face similar risk factors tied to defense budget cycles and contract timing, yet LHX currently exhibits tighter trading ranges. Market sentiment reflects shared sector tailwinds from sustained U.S. and allied spending, offset by valuation scrutiny that has weighed more heavily on NOC in recent weeks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, backlog visibility, and relative price stability in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to LHX over NOC. The assessment incorporates factors such as earnings delivery strength and contract momentum, while acknowledging that broader defense sector dynamics and upcoming quarterly results could influence positioning for either security.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHX is a Buy and NOC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LHX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LHX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LHX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LHX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NOC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +6.45% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +3.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
LHX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
NOC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-0.19% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| LHX | NOC | LHX / NOC | |
| Capitalization | 55.9B | 77B | 73% |
| EBITDA | 3.85B | 7.7B | 50% |
| Gain YTD | 3.034 | -4.181 | -73% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.60 | 17.24 | 189% |
| Revenue | 22.5B | 42.4B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 590M | 2.09B | 28% |
| Total Debt | 11.4B | 16.3B | 70% |
LHX | NOC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (54) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (59) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
NOC's SMR Rating (34) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (76) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (59) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (69) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
| LHX | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 10 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
LHX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.