LHX
Price
$291.85
Change
+$3.39 (+1.18%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.72B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOC
Price
$585.96
Change
+$11.22 (+1.95%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.65B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LHX vs NOC

LHX vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? L3Harris Technologies (LHX) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • LHX and NOC are both leading U.S. defense contractors with strong exposure to government contracts in aerospace, communications, and missile systems.
  • Recent market activity shows LHX benefiting from new Space Force satellite contracts and a dividend increase, supporting positive price momentum in recent weeks.
  • NOC reported Q2 2026 results that beat estimates with raised full-year guidance and maintains a record backlog exceeding $100 billion, underscoring robust demand.
  • Both stocks have delivered modest year-to-date gains amid broader defense sector stability, with LHX showing slightly stronger recent price appreciation compared to NOC.
  • Key contrasts include LHX’s focus on integrated communications and space systems versus NOC’s emphasis on large-scale platforms and autonomous systems.
  • Sector sentiment remains supported by sustained U.S. defense spending priorities, though both face typical risks from contract timing and budgetary cycles.

Introduction

Investors and traders often compare LHX and NOC as prominent names in the aerospace and defense sector. Both companies derive the majority of revenue from long-term U.S. government contracts, making them sensitive to federal budget allocations and geopolitical developments. This comparison is particularly relevant for those seeking exposure to defense spending trends, portfolio diversification within industrials, or relative performance analysis between mid- and large-cap defense contractors. The analysis examines recent price behavior, operational highlights, and market positioning to provide a factual basis for evaluating their respective profiles in the current environment.

LHX Overview and Recent Performance

L3Harris Technologies (LHX) provides mission-critical communications, electronic warfare, and space systems to defense and commercial customers. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited positive momentum driven by contract wins, including a U.S. Space Force selection for advanced tracking satellites and additional Army and Missile Defense Agency awards. The company also announced a quarterly dividend increase. Trading near $300 as of late July 2026, LHX posted gains of approximately 4.5% over the prior month and 3% year-to-date. Upcoming Q2 2026 earnings, scheduled for release on July 29, represent a near-term catalyst that could further influence sentiment. Broader market activity reflects steady interest in the company’s backlog visibility and margin expansion trends observed in prior quarters.

NOC Overview and Recent Performance

Northrop Grumman (NOC) develops advanced aerospace platforms, autonomous systems, and missile defense technologies. Recent performance has been supported by strong Q2 2026 results released on July 21, which exceeded revenue and earnings estimates, prompting a modest upward revision to full-year guidance. The company maintains a record backlog above $100 billion, reflecting sustained demand across its segments. Shares traded near $542 in late July 2026, with mixed short-term price action following the earnings release. Year-to-date performance has been relatively flat to modestly positive. Sentiment in recent weeks has been shaped by the robust order intake and operational execution, offset by typical post-earnings volatility common in the sector.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent performance metrics, and suitable risk profiles are featured in this trending section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with performance statistics varying by bot—often including metrics such as win rates, average returns per trade, and drawdown levels in published ranges. This diversity allows users to explore options tailored to different market environments. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot profiles and live statistics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business models, LHX emphasizes integrated mission solutions and space-based capabilities, while NOC focuses on large-scale platforms such as bombers and autonomous vehicles, creating distinct growth drivers tied to specific program funding. Recent momentum has favored LHX with contract-driven gains, whereas NOC demonstrated earnings strength and backlog expansion. Risk factors for both include dependence on defense appropriations and potential delays in contract awards, though NOC’s larger scale may offer greater revenue stability. Sector exposure overlaps significantly in aerospace and defense, yet LHX carries a somewhat higher weighting toward communications and electronics. Market sentiment reflects steady institutional interest in both, with relative positioning influenced by upcoming earnings for LHX and recent positive results for NOC.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent contract momentum, earnings consistency, and backlog visibility, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term positioning to NOC. The company’s demonstrated ability to beat estimates and maintain a substantial backlog provides a measure of trend stability, though outcomes remain subject to broader market and sector dynamics. LHX shows competitive strength through new awards and upcoming catalysts. Investors should monitor earnings releases and contract flows for updated signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LHX vs. NOC commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHX is a Buy and NOC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (LHX: $288.46 vs. NOC: $574.74)
Brand notoriety: LHX: Not notable vs. NOC: Notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LHX: 72% vs. NOC: 44%
Market capitalization -- LHX: $53.72B vs. NOC: $81.65B
LHX [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $53.72B. NOC’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $81.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $1.86T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $43.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LHX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LHX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the long-term than LHX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LHX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LHX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the short-term than LHX.

Price Growth

LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

LHX is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

NOC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+3.43% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOC($81.6B) has a higher market cap than LHX($53.7B). LHX has higher P/E ratio than NOC: LHX (29.14) vs NOC (18.27). NOC YTD gains are higher at: 1.562 vs. LHX (-0.999). NOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.44B vs. LHX (4B). NOC has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. LHX (1.52B). LHX has less debt than NOC: LHX (11B) vs NOC (16.3B). NOC has higher revenues than LHX: NOC (42.9B) vs LHX (22.9B).
LHXNOCLHX / NOC
Capitalization53.7B81.6B66%
EBITDA4B7.44B54%
Gain YTD-0.9991.562-64%
P/E Ratio29.1418.27159%
Revenue22.9B42.9B53%
Total Cash1.52B2.31B66%
Total Debt11B16.3B67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LHX vs NOC: Fundamental Ratings
LHX
NOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3038
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5653
SMR RATING
1..100
7437
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
734

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (57) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (56) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's SMR Rating (37) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (74) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (59) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.

LHX's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (65) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LHXNOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRNS45.823.89
+9.28%
Varonis Systems
RHLD131.312.85
+2.22%
Resolute Holdings Management
ALL260.484.64
+1.81%
Allstate Corp (The)
BFRI1.260.01
+0.80%
Biofrontera
SND4.95-0.01
-0.20%
Smart Sand

LHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LHX
1D Price
Change %
LHX100%
-0.78%
NOC - LHX
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
RTX - LHX
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
GD - LHX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
LMT - LHX
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
KTOS - LHX
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
More

NOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been closely correlated with LMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then LMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOC
1D Price
Change %
NOC100%
-0.45%
LMT - NOC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
LHX - NOC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
RTX - NOC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
GD - NOC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
HII - NOC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More