LTH
Price
$14.10
Change
-$0.55 (-3.75%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
OSW
Price
$12.53
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price LTH vs OSW

Header iconLTH vs OSW Comparison
Open Charts LTH vs OSWBanner chart's image
Life Time Group Holdings
Price$14.10
Change-$0.55 (-3.75%)
Volume$150.46K
CapitalizationN/A
OneSpaWorld Holdings
Price$12.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$162.44K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LTH vs OSW Comparison Chart

Loading...

LTHDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
OSWDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
LTH vs. OSW commentary
Apr 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTH is a StrongSell and OSW is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2024
Stock price -- (LTH: $14.11 vs. OSW: $12.53)
Brand notoriety: LTH and OSW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTH: 69% vs. OSW: 55%
Market capitalization -- LTH: $2.99B vs. OSW: $1.35B
LTH [@Recreational Products] is valued at $2.99B. OSW’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LTH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OSW is a better buy in the long-term than LTH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSW is a better buy in the short-term than LTH.

Price Growth

LTH (@Recreational Products) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while OSW (@Recreational Products) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

LTH is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

OSW is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.67% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LTH with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for OSW with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTH($2.99B) has a higher market cap than OSW($1.35B). OSW has higher P/E ratio than LTH: OSW (1333.00) vs LTH (41.11). LTH YTD gains are higher at: -6.432 vs. OSW (-11.135). LTH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 470M vs. OSW (38.9M). LTH has more cash in the bank: 30M vs. OSW (27.7M). OSW has less debt than LTH: OSW (171M) vs LTH (4.26B). LTH has higher revenues than OSW: LTH (2.22B) vs OSW (794M).
LTHOSWLTH / OSW
Capitalization2.99B1.35B222%
EBITDA470M38.9M1,208%
Gain YTD-6.432-11.13558%
P/E Ratio41.111333.003%
Revenue2.22B794M279%
Total Cash30M27.7M108%
Total Debt4.26B171M2,492%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OSW: Fundamental Ratings
OSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTHOSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LTHDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
OSWDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LADIX22.38-0.01
-0.04%
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income I
IUAIX43.43-0.19
-0.44%
VY® Invesco Equity and Income I
RNPGX58.72-0.28
-0.47%
American Funds New Perspective R6
FDTIX37.06-0.21
-0.56%
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock I
CAMSX15.11-0.17
-1.11%
Cambiar Small Cap Inv

LTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTH has been loosely correlated with PLNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTH jumps, then PLNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTH
1D Price
Change %
LTH100%
-3.69%
PLNT - LTH
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
PRKS - LTH
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
PII - LTH
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
HOG - LTH
39%
Loosely correlated
-15.75%
BC - LTH
39%
Loosely correlated
-7.12%
More

OSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSW
1D Price
Change %
OSW100%
+0.08%
CUK - OSW
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
MODG - OSW
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
PII - OSW
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
PRKS - OSW
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
BC - OSW
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
More