MOFG
Price
$21.87
Change
+$0.37 (+1.72%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
68 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$16.20
Change
+$0.07 (+0.43%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MOFG vs PFS

Header iconMOFG vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts MOFG vs PFSBanner chart's image
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$21.87
Change+$0.37 (+1.72%)
Volume$20.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Provident Financial Services
Price$16.20
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
Volume$396.01K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MOFG vs PFS Comparison Chart

Loading...

MOFGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
PFSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
MOFG vs. PFS commentary
May 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOFG is a StrongBuy and PFS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MOFG: $21.87 vs. PFS: $16.18)
Brand notoriety: MOFG and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOFG: 110% vs. PFS: 138%
Market capitalization -- MOFG: $369.19M vs. PFS: $1.1B
MOFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $369.19M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MOFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MOFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MOFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

MOFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MOFG with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for PFS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than MOFG($369M). MOFG has higher P/E ratio than PFS: MOFG (17.17) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: -8.833 vs. MOFG (-17.850). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. MOFG (71M). MOFG has less debt than PFS: MOFG (418M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than MOFG: PFS (479M) vs MOFG (163M).
MOFGPFSMOFG / PFS
Capitalization369M1.1B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.850-8.833202%
P/E Ratio17.178.49202%
Revenue163M479M34%
Total Cash71M189M38%
Total Debt418M1.46B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MOFG vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
MOFG
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
2613
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
926
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MOFG's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (67) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (26) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOFGPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MOFGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
PFSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHMYX26.810.04
+0.15%
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Y
LMGNX65.490.06
+0.09%
ClearBridge International Growth I
GSTSX9.17N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Svc
WSMCX19.78-0.02
-0.10%
Allspring Small Company Growth C
CLPCX11.07-0.02
-0.18%
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity C

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with MSBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then MSBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
+1.72%
MSBI - MOFG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
HBNC - MOFG
80%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
GSBC - MOFG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
THFF - MOFG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
WSBC - MOFG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with LBAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then LBAI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+0.43%
LBAI - PFS
97%
Closely correlated
N/A
STBA - PFS
88%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
FCF - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
TRST - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
WSBC - PFS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More