It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NAMS (@Biotechnology) experienced а +10.29% price change this week, while SANA (@Biotechnology) price change was -16.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.
NAMS is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
SANA is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
NAMS | SANA | NAMS / SANA | |
Capitalization | 2.31B | 578M | 399% |
EBITDA | -205.21M | -229.49M | 89% |
Gain YTD | 123.545 | -36.520 | -338% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 7.42M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 431M | 252M | 171% |
Total Debt | 562K | 98.6M | 1% |
NAMS | SANA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago36% | 1 day ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 11 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago65% | 1 day ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago89% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NAMS and GYRE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAMS and GYRE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NAMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NAMS | 100% | +1.50% | ||
GYRE - NAMS | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
SANA - NAMS | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
WXXWY - NAMS | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.74% | ||
SLN - NAMS | 24% Poorly correlated | -8.27% | ||
ANAB - NAMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
More |