Ad is loading...
NAMS
Price
$20.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
126 days until earnings call
VOR
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
118 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NAMS vs VOR

Header iconNAMS vs VOR Comparison
Open Charts NAMS vs VORBanner chart's image
NewAmsterdam Pharma
Price$20.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.18M
CapitalizationN/A
Vor Biopharma
Price$0.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$359.2K
CapitalizationN/A
NAMS vs VOR Comparison Chart
Loading...
NAMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAMS vs. VOR commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAMS is a Hold and VOR is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (NAMS: $20.12 vs. VOR: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: NAMS and VOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAMS: 251% vs. VOR: 64%
Market capitalization -- NAMS: $1.86B vs. VOR: $54.58M
NAMS [@Biotechnology] is valued at $1.86B. VOR’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $54.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $463.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VOR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAMS is a better buy in the long-term than VOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VOR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VOR is a better buy in the short-term than NAMS.

Price Growth

NAMS (@Biotechnology) experienced а -19.42% price change this week, while VOR (@Biotechnology) price change was -11.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAMS is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

VOR is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+2.14% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAMS($1.87B) has a higher market cap than VOR($54.3M). NAMS YTD gains are higher at: 80.125 vs. VOR (-64.618). VOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -114.44M vs. NAMS (-180.78M). NAMS has more cash in the bank: 423M vs. VOR (62.8M). NAMS has less debt than VOR: NAMS (506K) vs VOR (32.9M). NAMS has higher revenues than VOR: NAMS (33.6M) vs VOR (0).
NAMSVORNAMS / VOR
Capitalization1.87B54.3M3,436%
EBITDA-180.78M-114.44M158%
Gain YTD80.125-64.618-124%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue33.6M0-
Total Cash423M62.8M674%
Total Debt506K32.9M2%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAMSVOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NAMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYOTX12.710.26
+2.09%
Royce Micro-Cap Invmt
CRBRX14.390.29
+2.06%
Columbia Acorn Inst2
LSPAX5.610.04
+0.72%
LoCorr Spectrum Income A
REINX18.250.10
+0.55%
Invesco Real Estate Investor
RGBHX38.320.06
+0.16%
American Funds Global Balanced R5E

NAMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAMS and GYRE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAMS and GYRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAMS
1D Price
Change %
NAMS100%
+0.55%
GYRE - NAMS
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.99%
WXXWY - NAMS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
SANA - NAMS
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.11%
SLN - NAMS
24%
Poorly correlated
+10.82%
VOR - NAMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

VOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOR has been loosely correlated with MDGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VOR jumps, then MDGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VOR
1D Price
Change %
VOR100%
+0.16%
MDGL - VOR
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.83%
ORMP - VOR
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
IBIO - VOR
37%
Loosely correlated
+11.87%
XERS - VOR
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
PSTX - VOR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More