Ad is loading...
NBMLX vs TRQZX
NBMLX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NBMLX vs TRQZX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inst
Price$19.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$114.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NBMLX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. NBMLX (1.93B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NBMLX: TRQZX (0.68) vs NBMLX (0.00). NBMLX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NBMLX (18 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). NBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRQZX (21.70). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMLX: TRQZX (0) vs NBMLX (1000000). NBMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.42 vs. TRQZX (18.13).
| NBMLX | TRQZX | NBMLX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.561 | 13.325 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 32B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.42 | 18.13 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.75 | -13.70 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.91 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.05 | N/A | - |