Ad is loading...
NBMTX vs TRQZX
NBMTX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NBMTX vs TRQZX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
Price$17.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$110.49
Change-$0.77 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMTX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. NBMTX (1.74B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: TRQZX (0.68) vs NBMTX (0.00). NBMTX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NBMTX (31 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRQZX (21.70). NBMTX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.83 vs. TRQZX (15.59).
| NBMTX | TRQZX | NBMTX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.365 | 9.624 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 31.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.83 | 15.59 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.44 | -12.38 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...