Ad is loading...
NMANX vs RPMGX
NMANX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs RPMGX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$17.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$109.07
Change-$0.77 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMANX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. NMANX (1.74B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than NMANX: RPMGX (0.05) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMANX (46 years) vs RPMGX (32 years). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RPMGX (21.70). NMANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMANX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.64 vs. RPMGX (10.98). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 13.58 vs. NMANX (8.66).
| NMANX | RPMGX | NMANX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.104 | 8.137 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 31.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.64 | 10.98 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.87 | -15.72 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.66 | 13.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.84 | 39.28 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...