Ad is loading...
NMANX vs TRQZX
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs TRQZX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$17.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$110.49
Change-$0.77 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. NMANX (1.74B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMANX: TRQZX (0.68) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMANX (46 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRQZX (21.70). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: TRQZX (0) vs NMANX (1000). NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.64 vs. TRQZX (11.88).
| NMANX | TRQZX | NMANX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.104 | 8.721 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 31.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.64 | 11.88 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.87 | -14.32 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.66 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...