Ad is loading...
NMUCX vs RWMFX
NMUCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWMFX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.16
Change-$0.06 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.97
Change-$0.39 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NMUCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. NMUCX (263M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWMFX (1.70) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NMUCX (14.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWMFX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.83 vs. NMUCX (7.02). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.50 vs. NMUCX (-48.10).
| NMUCX | RWMFX | NMUCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.180 | 15.693 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 194B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 20.83 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.96 | 12.89 | -349% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.10 | 41.50 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.34 | 61.73 | -62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...