Ad is loading...
NSFKX vs RBHEX
NSFKX vs RBHEX Comparison
Open Charts NSFKX vs RBHEX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFKX vs RBHEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NSFKX vs. RBHEX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFKX is a Buy and RBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHEX has more cash in the bank: 33.8B vs. NSFKX (26M). NSFKX pays higher dividends than RBHEX: NSFKX (1.08) vs RBHEX (0.84). NSFKX was incepted earlier than RBHEX: NSFKX (8 years) vs RBHEX (10 years). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RBHEX (1.00). RBHEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFKX: RBHEX (250) vs NSFKX (1000000). RBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.24 vs. NSFKX (19.13). RBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. NSFKX (26.68).
| NSFKX | RBHEX | NSFKX / RBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.435 | 13.103 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26M | 33.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.84 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.13 | 21.24 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.00 | 0.21 | 481% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.68 | 35.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers