Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
NWCFX vs RGEBX
NWCFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGEBX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$70.21
Change-$1.75 (-2.43%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$76.66
Change-$1.28 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NWCFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 298B vs. NWCFX (985M). RGEBX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGEBX (0.16) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGEBX (10 years). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (31.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGEBX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). NWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.31 vs. RGEBX (27.10). NWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.90 vs. RGEBX (50.02).
| NWCFX | RGEBX | NWCFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.120 | 25.961 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 985M | 298B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.31 | 27.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.35 | -5.97 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.90 | 50.02 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.03 | 63.71 | 71% |