It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PFIE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PFIE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PFIE (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while TDW (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -9.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.35%.
PFIE is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
TDW is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
PFIE | TDW | PFIE / TDW | |
Capitalization | 87.1M | 4.81B | 2% |
EBITDA | 13.6M | 316M | 4% |
Gain YTD | 38.950 | -29.649 | -131% |
P/E Ratio | 8.41 | 50.98 | 16% |
Revenue | 58.2M | 1.01B | 6% |
Total Cash | 13.6M | 274M | 5% |
Total Debt | 438K | 734M | 0% |
PFIE | TDW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFIE's Valuation (66) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TDW (66). This means that PFIE’s stock grew similarly to TDW’s over the last 12 months.
TDW's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PFIE (65). This means that TDW’s stock grew similarly to PFIE’s over the last 12 months.
TDW's SMR Rating (54) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PFIE (55). This means that TDW’s stock grew similarly to PFIE’s over the last 12 months.
PFIE's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDW (90). This means that PFIE’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDW’s over the last 12 months.
PFIE's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for TDW (98). This means that PFIE’s stock grew significantly faster than TDW’s over the last 12 months.
PFIE | TDW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago82% | 12 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago78% | 5 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago71% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TZA | 11.93 | 0.51 | +4.47% |
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF | |||
BITS | 91.65 | 3.32 | +3.75% |
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Str ETF | |||
TBLL | 105.77 | 0.04 | +0.04% |
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
HYLG | 24.47 | -0.82 | -3.23% |
Global X Health Care Cvrd Cll&Gr ETF | |||
GGLL | 39.49 | -1.48 | -3.61% |
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFIE and FTI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFIE and FTI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFIE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PFIE | 100% | -0.20% | ||
FTI - PFIE | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
VAL - PFIE | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
SLB - PFIE | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
WTTR - PFIE | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
TDW - PFIE | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.62% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDW has been closely correlated with VAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDW jumps, then VAL could also see price increases.