PSI
Price
$148.32
Change
-$4.59 (-3.00%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Net Assets
2.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$556.34
Change
-$22.00 (-3.80%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Net Assets
63.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSI vs SMH

Header iconPSI vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts PSI vs SMHBanner chart's image
PSI vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • PSI employs a smart beta strategy tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index with ~30 U.S.-focused holdings selected on factors like price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value, offering broader exposure beyond mega-caps.
  • SMH is a passive, market-cap-weighted fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, concentrating ~70% in top 10 holdings like NVDA and TSM for liquidity and leadership tilt.
  • Expense ratios differ at 0.56% for PSI versus 0.35% for SMH, impacting long-term cost efficiency in favor of SMH.
  • Both exhibit high sector concentration in technology (~98-100%), but PSI's quarterly rebalancing enhances adaptability, while SMH's structure amplifies mega-cap momentum.
  • SMH displays lower short-term volatility due to mega-cap dominance, whereas PSI offers potential resilience in mid-cap rotations within the semiconductor space.
  • Both benefit from AI-driven demand, but SMH's positioning captures outsized gains from industry leaders amid current capital flows.

Introduction

PSI and SMH provide targeted exposure to the semiconductor sector, a cornerstone of technology innovation amid surging AI infrastructure demand. While both ETFs focus on companies involved in chip design, manufacturing, and equipment, they represent alternative strategies: PSI's factor-based selection targets a balanced U.S.-only portfolio, while SMH's market-cap weighting emphasizes the largest, most liquid U.S.-listed players, including ADRs (American Depositary Receipts). This ETF comparison is particularly relevant now as hyperscalers ramp up capital expenditures for AI data centers, driving sector rotation toward semiconductors. Investors seeking pure-play exposure must weigh diversification versus concentration in this high-growth, volatile arena.

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) Overview

The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) tracks the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index, a smart beta benchmark comprising approximately 30 common stocks of U.S. semiconductor companies principally engaged in manufacturing semiconductors. This passive yet factor-driven strategy selects and weights holdings based on investment merit criteria including price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value, aiming for capital appreciation. The fund holds around 31 stocks, with top holdings often including MXL (~8-9%), AMD (~6-7%), MU, TXN, and AVGO, where the top 10 account for ~50% of assets. Sector allocation is heavily tilted toward technology (~98%), with minor industrials exposure. The expense ratio stands at 0.56%, and the non-diversified fund rebalances quarterly (February, May, August, November), potentially leading to higher turnover. PSI's U.S.-only focus distinguishes it structurally, emphasizing mid- and small-cap vulnerability alongside growth potential.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) seeks to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark tracking the performance of the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-exchange-listed semiconductor companies involved in production and equipment. This passive strategy favors industry leaders, including U.S.-listed foreign firms via ADRs, for enhanced representation. The fund holds ~26 stocks, with top holdings dominated by NVDA (~18%), TSM (~10%), INTC (~7-8%), AVGO, and AMD, comprising ~72% of assets. Allocation is 100% technology. The expense ratio is a competitive 0.35%, with low turnover (~12%) reflecting stable mega-cap focus. As a non-diversified fund, SMH amplifies liquidity and global scope within U.S. listings, positioning it for momentum-driven sector gains.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor sector operates in a robust environment fueled by AI infrastructure expansion, with global sales projected to approach $1 trillion in 2026 amid a historic upcycle. Key catalysts include hyperscaler capital expenditures exceeding $600 billion, prioritizing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and advanced logic for data centers, alongside memory price surges from supply constraints. Capital flows favor AI accelerators, networking, and equipment, supported by server refresh cycles and edge AI deployment. Regulatory developments like the CHIPS Act bolster domestic manufacturing, while macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate stability aid capex. Risks encompass geopolitical tensions, HBM bottlenecks, energy costs, and potential softening in consumer electronics, though AI demand structurally reprices the industry upward.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both PSI and SMH have surged with semiconductor tailwinds from AI earnings beats at holdings like NVDA and AMD, amplified by hyperscaler capex and memory recovery. SMH's mega-cap concentration has delivered strong relative positioning in momentum phases, though trailing PSI's factor-balanced gains in broader rotations (e.g., PSI up ~92% YTD vs. SMH ~57%). PSI exhibits higher volatility (~11% vs. SMH's ~9% over recent months), reflecting mid-cap sensitivity, but quarterly rebalancing provides consistency across earnings cycles. SMH's lower beta suits trend-following amid sector leaders' dominance, while PSI offers diversification benefits during value shifts or equipment/memory upswings, connecting to interest rate expectations and AI supply chain dynamics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH with moderate probability due to its lower expense ratio, superior long-term trend consistency (e.g., 10-year annualized ~37% vs. PSI's ~34%), cost efficiency, and alignment with mega-cap momentum in the AI supercycle. SMH's liquidity profile and concentrated exposure to sector leaders enhance relative positioning amid capital flows to high-bandwidth applications, despite PSI's diversification and rebalancing strengths. This assessment reflects observable structural advantages, not advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PSI vs. SMH commentary
May 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSI is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 63B vs. PSI (2.43B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: PSI (88.080) vs SMH (54.483). PSI was incepted earlier than SMH: PSI (21 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than PSI (0.56). PSI has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
PSISMHPSI / SMH
Gain YTD88.08054.483162%
Net Assets2.43B63B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.560.35160%
Turnover78.0012.00650%
Yield0.060.2225%
Fund Existence21 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSISMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USSH50.37-0.06
-0.11%
WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Trsy ETF
NVBW35.24-0.11
-0.31%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF
PSCT78.65-1.02
-1.28%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Info Tech ETF
IVOO122.22-2.03
-1.63%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
AVGW49.60-1.87
-3.63%
Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay ETF

PSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSI
1D Price
Change %
PSI100%
-3.00%
LRCX - PSI
85%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
TER - PSI
84%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
SYNA - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
MKSI - PSI
81%
Closely correlated
-3.39%
AMAT - PSI
81%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
More