Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSI vs SMH
PSI vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts PSI vs SMH
PSI vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+41%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSI vs. SMH commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSI is a StrongBuy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.6B vs. PSI (2.53B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: PSI (88.224) vs SMH (61.803). PSI was incepted earlier than SMH: PSI (21 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than PSI (0.56). PSI has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| PSI | SMH | PSI / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 88.224 | 61.803 | 143% |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 71.6B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.35 | 160% |
| Turnover | 105.00 | 12.00 | 875% |
| Yield | 0.04 | 0.20 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PSI | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+41%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PSI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSI | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| ONTO - PSI | 86% Closely correlated | +14.74% | ||
| TER - PSI | 84% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| SYNA - PSI | 83% Closely correlated | +4.01% | ||
| ACLS - PSI | 81% Closely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| GFS - PSI | 77% Closely correlated | +7.09% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.96% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| MU - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||