PTUUF vs TNTMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTUUF is a Hold and TNTMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PTUUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNTMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PTUUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TNTMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
PTUUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.71% price change this week, while TNTMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -24.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| PTUUF | TNTMF | PTUUF / TNTMF | |
| Capitalization | 11M | 2.23M | 493% |
| EBITDA | -7.51M | -1.55M | 485% |
| Gain YTD | -45.979 | -12.206 | 377% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 1.5M | 2M | 75% |
| Total Debt | 98.5K | N/A | - |
PTUUF | TNTMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PTUUF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TNTMF (84). This means that PTUUF’s stock grew similarly to TNTMF’s over the last 12 months.
PTUUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TNTMF (100). This means that PTUUF’s stock grew similarly to TNTMF’s over the last 12 months.
TNTMF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PTUUF (97). This means that TNTMF’s stock grew similarly to PTUUF’s over the last 12 months.
PTUUF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as TNTMF (83). This means that PTUUF’s stock grew similarly to TNTMF’s over the last 12 months.
TNTMF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as PTUUF (100). This means that TNTMF’s stock grew similarly to PTUUF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BPLSX | 15.35 | -0.06 | -0.39% |
| Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl | |||
| MXECX | 9.55 | -0.04 | -0.42% |
| Empower Core Strategies Intl Eq Instl | |||
| NTIAX | 16.11 | -0.18 | -1.10% |
| Columbia Mid Cap Index A | |||
| BGCJX | 14.89 | -0.19 | -1.26% |
| Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 3 | |||
| JFRDX | 55.86 | -1.45 | -2.53% |
| Janus Henderson Forty D | |||
PTUUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PTUUF and MACQF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTUUF and MACQF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTUUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTUUF | 100% | -6.28% | ||
| MACQF - PTUUF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APCOF - PTUUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TNTMF - PTUUF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| POROF - PTUUF | 8% Poorly correlated | +42.70% | ||
| PGXPF - PTUUF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TNTMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TNTMF and LXENF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNTMF and LXENF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNTMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNTMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LXENF - TNTMF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
| ATOXF - TNTMF | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.71% | ||
| PTUUF - TNTMF | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.28% | ||
| TMRC - TNTMF | 16% Poorly correlated | +8.75% | ||
| TNREF - TNTMF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||