PXE
Price
$44.98
Change
+$1.08 (+2.46%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Net Assets
169.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOP
Price
$203.76
Change
+$4.24 (+2.13%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Net Assets
4.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PXE vs XOP

PXE vs XOP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 28, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) vs. SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)

Key Takeaways

  • Different weighting philosophies: PXE uses a multi-factor "Intellidex" selection process, while XOP tracks a modified equal-weight index, producing meaningfully different exposure profiles.
  • Concentration versus breadth: PXE holds roughly 30–31 stocks with top positions near 5–6% each, whereas XOP holds about 54–56 names with each position near 2–3%.
  • Cost gap: XOP's 0.35% expense ratio is markedly lower than PXE's 0.63% net expense ratio, a durable structural advantage for XOP.
  • Refining tilt: PXE carries a significant allocation to oil refining and marketing companies, while XOP is dominated by upstream exploration and production (E&P) names.
  • Liquidity and scale: XOP is substantially larger and more liquid, while PXE is a smaller, non-diversified fund with a mid-cap and value tilt.
  • Risk profiles differ: PXE's factor-driven concentration can amplify single-stock and refining-cycle risk, whereas XOP's equal weighting spreads company-specific risk more evenly across the E&P universe.

Introduction

Both PXE and XOP give investors concentrated access to the U.S. energy complex, yet they are not interchangeable. PXE blends exploration and production exposure with a substantial refining-and-marketing sleeve, while XOP is a purer, broader bet on upstream oil and gas producers. With crude prices, refining margins, and capital-discipline trends shaping the sector, understanding these structural differences is essential for any investor building energy exposure. This ETF comparison examines how index design, sector allocation, cost, and diversification shape the relative positioning and fund performance of each product.

Invesco Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) Overview

PXE is a passively managed index fund that seeks to track the Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index. Rather than weighting by market capitalization, the index evaluates U.S. energy companies across investment-merit criteria such as price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The fund and its index are reconstituted and rebalanced quarterly (February, May, August, and November).

The portfolio holds roughly 30–31 securities, making it a non-diversified fund by regulatory standards. Top holdings have recently included MPC (Marathon Petroleum), VLO (Valero Energy), PSX (Phillips 66), COP (ConocoPhillips), OXY (Occidental Petroleum), EOG (EOG Resources), FANG (Diamondback Energy), and EQT (EQT Corp). Sector exposure is split between oil and gas E&P (roughly 60%) and oil and gas refining and marketing (around 33%), with smaller allocations to integrated oil and gas utilities. The fund's net expense ratio is 0.63%, and it carries a mid-cap value tilt, with total assets under management (AUM) in the low hundreds of millions of dollars.

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) Overview

XOP is a passively managed fund that seeks to replicate the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, a modified equal-weight index representing the oil and gas E&P sub-industry of the broader S&P Total Market Index. Equal weighting prevents any single mega-cap producer from dominating the portfolio and periodically rebalances positions back toward parity.

The fund holds about 54–56 securities, with each position generally representing between 2% and 3% of assets. Recent top holdings have included PBF (PBF Energy), MPC, VLO, DINO (HF Sinclair), PSX, XOM (ExxonMobil), CVX (Chevron), and EOG. The Energy sector accounts for roughly 96–99% of the portfolio, with a small residual in basic materials. XOP's expense ratio is 0.35%, among the lowest in the E&P category, and the fund holds several billion dollars in AUM, giving it deep liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds sit squarely within the cyclical U.S. energy sector, where the dominant drivers are global crude oil and natural gas prices, refining margins, and producers' capital-discipline strategy. In recent market cycles, exploration and production companies have prioritized free-cash-flow generation, share buybacks, and dividends over aggressive drilling growth, a shift that has reshaped valuations and volatility across the space.

Refining-focused names, which feature more heavily in PXE, are influenced by crack spreads, fuel demand, and maintenance cycles, while upstream producers in XOP respond more directly to benchmark commodity prices and well productivity. Macro forces—including interest-rate expectations, OPEC-plus output decisions, geopolitical supply disruptions, and the pace of the energy transition—continue to shape sentiment. Regulatory developments around permitting and emissions, along with capital-allocation shifts by institutional investors, add another layer of sector risk that affects both funds, though through somewhat different holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months and market cycles, the two funds have often moved in the same general direction, reflecting their shared energy beta, but their relative positioning has diverged in important ways. PXE's refining-and-marketing sleeve and factor-selected concentration have at times led it to outperform when refining margins widened and mid-cap value names rallied, while its smaller, momentum-driven roster can lag when broad-based upstream strength favors a wider set of producers.

XOP's equal-weight structure tends to capture a more diversified slice of the E&P rally or decline, reducing reliance on any single stock or sub-industry. Its lower expense ratio and greater breadth generally translate into a smoother volatility profile relative to PXE, though both remain high-volatility, commodity-sensitive vehicles. When crude prices and energy earnings cycles strengthen, XOP's upstream-heavy book tends to track the commodity more directly, whereas PXE's refining tilt introduces a distinct set of margin-driven return drivers that can decouple from crude oil alone.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs with customizable filters, including industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics, to surface trade ideas, trending names, and breakout candidates more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own energy-sector watchlist.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward XOP at the present juncture. The fund's materially lower expense ratio, broader and more balanced equal-weight diversification, deeper liquidity, and purer upstream exposure give it a more consistent structural profile across energy cycles. While PXE's factor-driven selection can capture momentum and quality episodes in refining and mid-cap value, its higher cost, concentration, and non-diversified structure introduce additional idiosyncratic risk. Accordingly, the AI would assign a modest probabilistic edge to XOP for investors seeking efficient, diversified energy exposure, while acknowledging that PXE remains a viable satellite choice when refining margins and momentum factors are particularly favorable. This assessment is analytical, not personal investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PXE vs. XOP commentary
Nov 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PXE is a Hold and XOP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for PXE with price predictions
Oct 30, 2026

PXE's RSI Indicator recovers from overbought zone

The 10-day RSI Oscillator for PXE moved out of overbought territory on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 30 of the 33 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 47 of 60 cases where PXE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PXE turned negative on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 44 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 88%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PXE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.

PXE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PXE as a result. In 86 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

PXE moved above its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a +3.85% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PXE advanced for three days, in 338 of 375 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 286 of 321 cases where PXE Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 89%.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for XOP with price predictions
Oct 30, 2026

Momentum Indicator for XOP turns positive, indicating new upward trend

XOP saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 82 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 77 of the 82 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XOP just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where XOP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 45 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

XOP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for XOP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 18 of 21 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

Following a +4.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XOP advanced for three days, in 353 of 386 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 267 of 295 cases where XOP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for XOP moved out of overbought territory on October 14, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 34 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 31 of the 34 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 55 of 66 cases where XOP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XOP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.

XOP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PXEXOP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
PXE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

PXE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PXE has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PXE jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PXE
1D Price
Change %
PXE100%
+2.46%
OVV - PXE
88%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
MTDR - PXE
87%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
EOG - PXE
87%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
DVN - PXE
87%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
PR - PXE
86%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
More

XOP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOP has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOP jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOP
1D Price
Change %
XOP100%
+2.13%
MTDR - XOP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
OVV - XOP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
EOG - XOP
86%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
DVN - XOP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
PR - XOP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMF29.850.39
+1.32%
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF)
HOMZ42.500.07
+0.17%
Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ)
TJUL30.76-0.03
-0.10%
Innovator 2 Yr to July 2027 (TJUL)
CGUI25.24-0.08
-0.30%
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI)
OPEX2.00-0.22
-9.91%
Tradr 2X Long OPEN Daily ETF (OPEX)