Ad is loading...
RGACX vs STCZX
RGACX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$69.13
Change-$1.50 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$13.94
Change-$0.29 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs STCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
RGACX vs. STCZX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. STCZX (175M). RGACX pays higher dividends than STCZX: RGACX (0.25) vs STCZX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGACX (22 years) vs STCZX (10 years). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. STCZX (17.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGACX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.39 vs. RGACX (17.82). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 75.90 vs. RGACX (44.83).
| RGACX | STCZX | RGACX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.333 | 19.479 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 175M | 154,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.82 | 27.39 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.22 | 16.16 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.83 | 75.90 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.27 | 36.96 | 147% |