RMBHF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
TMAK
Price
$9.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

RMBHF vs TMAK

Header iconRMBHF vs TMAK Comparison
Open Charts RMBHF vs TMAKBanner chart's image
RMB Holdings
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.59K
CapitalizationN/A
Touchmark Bancshares
Price$9.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.44K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
RMBHF vs TMAK Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
RMBHF vs. TMAK commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBHF is a Hold and TMAK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RMBHF: $0.02 vs. TMAK: $9.67)
Brand notoriety: RMBHF and TMAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMBHF: 100% vs. TMAK: 281%
Market capitalization -- RMBHF: $48.48M vs. TMAK: $13.9M
RMBHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $48.48M. TMAK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMBHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMAK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RMBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMAK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMAK is a better buy in the long-term than RMBHF.

Price Growth

RMBHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMAK (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBHF($48.5M) has a higher market cap than TMAK($13.9M). RMBHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. TMAK (-3.781). TMAK has less debt than RMBHF: TMAK (15.2M) vs RMBHF (1.04B). RMBHF has higher revenues than TMAK: RMBHF (54M) vs TMAK (6.36M).
RMBHFTMAKRMBHF / TMAK
Capitalization48.5M13.9M349%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-3.781-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue54M6.36M849%
Total Cash17MN/A-
Total Debt1.04B15.2M6,829%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMAK: Fundamental Ratings
TMAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

RMBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBHF has been closely correlated with WTBFA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBHF jumps, then WTBFA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBHF
1D Price
Change %
RMBHF100%
N/A
WTBFA - RMBHF
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
NWPP - RMBHF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMAK - RMBHF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
HARL - RMBHF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
ALBKY - RMBHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More

TMAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMAK has been loosely correlated with RMBHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMAK jumps, then RMBHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMAK
1D Price
Change %
TMAK100%
+1.79%
RMBHF - TMAK
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WTBFA - TMAK
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSBQ - TMAK
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
JPPHY - TMAK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRVR - TMAK
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More