FSTA vs THS ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Buy and THS is a StrongSell.
THS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FSTA | THS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSIHX | 22.02 | 0.06 | +0.27% |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A | |||
| JORAX | 18.88 | 0.03 | +0.16% |
| Janus Henderson Global Select A | |||
| IJMIX | 15.72 | -0.03 | -0.19% |
| VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value I | |||
| MLUAX | 12.01 | -0.05 | -0.41% |
| MassMutual Mid Cap Value A | |||
| FARCX | 14.01 | -0.07 | -0.50% |
| Nuveen Real Estate Securities I | |||
FSTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTA | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| KO - FSTA | 78% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| PEP - FSTA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| PG - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| MDLZ - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CL - FSTA | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
THS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THS has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THS jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THS | 100% | -2.31% | ||
| CAG - THS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| POST - THS | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FLO - THS | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| INGR - THS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| K - THS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||