VPU
Price
$188.75
Change
-$3.60 (-1.87%)
Updated
Jun 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
10.58B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLU
Price
$43.49
Change
-$0.86 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jun 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
22.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VPU vs XLU

Header iconVPU vs XLU Comparison
Open Charts VPU vs XLUBanner chart's image
VPU vs XLU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) vs. Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU)

Key Takeaways

  • VPU tracks the broader MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index with 67 holdings across large-, mid-, and small-cap utilities, offering greater diversification than XLU's 31 large-cap S&P 500-focused holdings.
  • XLU provides concentrated exposure to sector leaders via the Utilities Select Sector Index, resulting in higher weighting to top holdings (top 10 at ~58%) and slightly lower expense ratio of 0.08% versus VPU's 0.09%.
  • Both ETFs exhibit similar sector allocations dominated by electric (62-66%) and multi-utilities (24-26%), but VPU includes more water utilities and small-caps for enhanced stability.
  • XLU demonstrates superior liquidity with higher average daily volume and larger AUM (~$24.6B vs. VPU's ~$8-11B), appealing to institutional traders.
  • Recent performance shows XLU slightly outperforming VPU in recent months and YTD 2026 due to large-cap momentum amid AI-driven power demand.
  • Both passive funds rebalance to track their indexes, with low turnover emphasizing cost efficiency and structural alignment to utilities sector dynamics.

Introduction

Comparing VPU and XLU highlights key alternatives within the U.S. utilities sector, a defensive area gaining traction from surging electricity demand tied to AI data centers and electrification trends. While both ETFs deliver targeted sector exposure with low costs, VPU provides broader market-cap diversification, contrasting XLU's focus on S&P 500 large-caps. Investors seeking stability amid market rotations or growth from power infrastructure may weigh these based on liquidity needs, concentration preferences, and relative positioning in the current environment of potential rate softening and capital-intensive utility expansions.

Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) Overview

The Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) is a passively managed fund seeking to track the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, encompassing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. utilities classified under GICS. It holds 67 stocks, providing multicap exposure to electric, gas, water utilities, and independent power producers. Top holdings include NEE (12.15%), SO (6.34%), DUK (6.33%), CEG (5.88%), and AEP (4.30%), with the top 10 comprising ~51% of assets. Sector breakdown features electric utilities (61.7%), multi-utilities (24.3%), independent power (5.3%), gas (4.8%), water (3.1%), and renewables (0.8%). The expense ratio is 0.09%, with AUM around $8-11 billion and inception in 2004. VPU employs full replication or sampling for precise tracking, low turnover (6.3%), and remains fully invested, emphasizing structural efficiency for long-term sector allocation.

Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) Overview

The Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU), managed by State Street, tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index, representing S&P 500 utilities companies. It maintains 31 holdings focused on large-cap leaders in electric utilities, multi-utilities, independent power producers, gas, and water. Top holdings are NEE (13.32%), SO (7.51%), DUK (7.15%), CEG (6.57%), and AEP (4.93%), with top 10 at ~58%. Sector weights include electric utilities (65.9%), multi-utilities (25.8%), independent power/renewables (4.3%), gas (2.1%), and water (1.9%). With a 0.08% expense ratio, ~$24.6 billion AUM, and 1998 inception, XLU offers high liquidity and precise large-cap sector beta through passive replication, quarterly rebalancing, and options availability for tactical positioning.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. utilities sector faces a transformative environment driven by AI data center expansion, projecting electricity demand growth of 1-3% annually through 2027—the strongest multi-year period since 2000. Data centers could consume up to 10% of U.S. power by 2030, spurring capex surges and power purchase agreements amid grid constraints. Lower interest rates reduce borrowing costs for infrastructure-heavy firms, while regulatory support and reindustrialization bolster onshoring. Risks include inflation from higher power prices, supply chain bottlenecks, and geopolitical tensions affecting fuel costs. Capital flows favor utilities as a defensive growth play, with sector ETFs attracting inflows despite broader equity rotations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have benefited from utilities' defensive appeal and AI power demand tailwinds, with XLU showing slight relative strength over VPU due to its large-cap concentration amplifying gains from leaders like NEE and CEG during earnings cycles. YTD 2026, XLU has edged VPU (~9.7% vs. ~9.2%), consistent over one-year horizons (~24% each), tied to sector rotation toward yield and stability amid rate expectations. VPU's mid/small-cap tilt provides smoother volatility in broader rotations, while XLU's liquidity supports momentum in upcycles. Relative positioning favors XLU in large-cap driven rallies but converges in macro shifts like commodity trends or geopolitical stability.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, covering thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies, and performance metrics. Only bots demonstrating the strongest results under prevailing market conditions earn featured spots, helping users identify tools aligned with current volatility, trends, or sector rotations like utilities. These include short-term scalpers, swing traders, and long-term trend followers, often highlighting momentum in power demand plays. Explore the curated selection to leverage data-driven signals without manual analysis—visit today to enhance your ETF trading edge.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLU with moderate confidence, citing its superior liquidity, marginal cost efficiency, concentrated exposure to high-momentum large-caps riding AI power trends, and consistent relative outperformance in recent market cycles. VPU's broader diversification suits risk-averse profiles, but XLU better captures sector tailwinds probabilistically.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
VPU vs. XLU commentary
Jun 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VPU is a Hold and XLU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLU has more net assets: 22.6B vs. VPU (10.6B). VPU (4.642) and XLU (4.615) have matching annual dividend yield . VPU was incepted earlier than XLU: VPU (22 years) vs XLU (27 years). XLU (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than VPU (0.09). VPU has a higher turnover XLU (2.00) vs XLU (2.00).
VPUXLUVPU / XLU
Gain YTD4.6424.615101%
Net Assets10.6B22.6B47%
Total Expense Ratio0.090.08113%
Turnover6.002.00300%
Yield2.642.6899%
Fund Existence22 years27 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VPUXLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VPU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGGS40.52-0.16
-0.39%
Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF
LQDI26.33-0.11
-0.42%
iShares Inflation Hedged Corp Bd ETF
EWQ45.36-0.93
-2.01%
iShares MSCI France ETF
USD88.68-17.96
-16.84%
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
GLGG7.08-2.12
-23.06%
Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF

VPU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VPU has been closely correlated with ETR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VPU jumps, then ETR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VPU
1D Price
Change %
VPU100%
+0.79%
ETR - VPU
81%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
AEE - VPU
79%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
LNT - VPU
78%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
DTE - VPU
78%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
CMS - VPU
77%
Closely correlated
+2.39%
More

XLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XLU and ES have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XLU and ES's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLU
1D Price
Change %
XLU100%
+0.93%
ES - XLU
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
ATO - XLU
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
PEG - XLU
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
D - XLU
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
XEL - XLU
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More