ET
Price
$16.23
Change
-$0.02 (-0.12%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
83 days until earnings call
FANG
Price
$203.72
Change
+$0.50 (+0.25%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
81 days until earnings call
SM
Price
$50.93
Change
+$0.30 (+0.59%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ET or FANG or SM

Header iconET vs FANG vs SM Comparison
Open Charts ET vs FANG vs SMBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$16.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
Volume$10.67M
CapitalizationN/A
Diamondback Energy
Price$203.72
Change+$0.50 (+0.25%)
Volume$425.46K
CapitalizationN/A
SM Energy
Price$50.93
Change+$0.30 (+0.59%)
Volume$301.92K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ET vs FANG vs SM Comparison Chart
ETDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FANGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2024
Stock price -- (ET: $16.25FANG: $203.22SM: $50.63)
Brand notoriety: ET and FANG are notable and SM is not notable
FANG and SM are part of the Oil & Gas Production industry, and ET is in the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 135%, FANG: 94%, SM: 85%
Market capitalization -- ET: $52.97B, FANG: $35.57B, SM: $5.77B
$FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. $SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $ $5.77B. $ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] has a market capitalization of $ $52.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $ $151.38B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $ $76.58B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $ $3.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $ $9.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and SM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than SM, which in turn is a better option than ET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the short-term than FANG, which in turn is a better option than SM.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +4.97% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +3.68% , and SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated +7.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2024.

SM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+4.33% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.64% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for ET with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FANG with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SM with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($53B) has a higher market cap than FANG($35.6B) and SM($5.77B). ET has higher P/E ratio than FANG and SM: ET (14.39) vs FANG (11.50) and SM (7.37). FANG YTD gains are higher at: 33.259 vs. SM (31.422) and ET (20.404). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. FANG (6.17B) and SM (1.7B). SM has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. FANG (582M) and ET (161M). SM has less debt than FANG and ET: SM (1.58B) vs FANG (6.8B) and ET (53.2B). ET has higher revenues than FANG and SM: ET (78.6B) vs FANG (8.34B) and SM (2.36B).
ETFANGSM
Capitalization53B35.6B5.77B
EBITDA12.6B6.17B1.7B
Gain YTD20.40433.25931.422
P/E Ratio14.3911.507.37
Revenue78.6B8.34B2.36B
Total Cash161M582M616M
Total Debt53.2B6.8B1.58B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs FANG vs SM: Fundamental Ratings
ET
FANG
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
247019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
302024
SMR RATING
1..100
714841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
433938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (6) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (50) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SM (66) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET's stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s and somewhat faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (24) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as ET (30) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that FANG's stock grew similarly to SM’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

SM's SMR Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as ET (71) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that SM's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

SM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as ET (43) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that SM's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

SM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (12) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as ET (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that SM's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETFANGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ETDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FANGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UUP28.800.04
+0.14%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bullish
AVMU46.370.01
+0.03%
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Inc ETF
GSIE34.12-0.02
-0.06%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
LRND30.92-0.04
-0.14%
IQ US Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
DFNV29.61-0.06
-0.20%
Donoghue Forlines Innovation ETF

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
-1.04%
MTDR - SM
87%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
MUR - SM
83%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
MRO - SM
83%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
PR - SM
82%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
MGY - SM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More