Ad is loading...
AABFX vs HBLIX
AABFX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLIX
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation A
Price$13.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets408.2M
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$14.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
AABFX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLIX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. AABFX (408M). HBLIX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLIX (3.65) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLIX (15 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.65). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLIX (61.00). AABFX (2000) and HBLIX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. HBLIX (2.54). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.48 vs. HBLIX (19.42).
| AABFX | HBLIX | AABFX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.65 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.65 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.745 | 1.653 | 45% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 408M | 11.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 2.54 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.42 | 9.70 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.48 | 19.42 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.20 | 35.31 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers