Ad is loading...
AABFX vs HBLVX
AABFX vs HBLVX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLVX
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation A
Price$13.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets408.2M
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$14.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
AABFX vs HBLVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLVX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. AABFX (408M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLVX (3.68) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLVX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLVX (11 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLVX (61.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than AABFX: HBLVX (0) vs AABFX (2000). AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. HBLVX (2.66). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.48 vs. HBLVX (19.99).
| AABFX | HBLVX | AABFX / HBLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.56 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.56 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.745 | 1.650 | 45% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 408M | 11.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.68 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 2.66 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.42 | 10.05 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.48 | 19.99 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.20 | 36.58 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers