Advertisement
AAC vs AMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAC is a Buy and AMN is a Hold.
Momentum Indicator for AAC turns negative, indicating new downward trend
AAC saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 11, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 23 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 1 of the 23 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 4%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AAC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 3%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: AAC's P/B Ratio (-114300.305) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (-544.924). P/E Ratio (-99.200) is within average values for comparable stocks, (119.490). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (18.598). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.021) among similar stocks. AAC's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.158).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. AAC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. AAC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
Momentum Indicator for AMN turns negative, indicating new downward trend
AMN saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 06, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 96 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 79 of the 96 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for AMN moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 19 of the 24 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 79%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AMN turned negative on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.
AMN moved below its 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AMN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +0.50% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AMN advanced for three days, in 218 of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
AMN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 141 of 165 cases where AMN Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 85%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AMN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.891) is normal, around the industry mean (204.532). P/E Ratio (13.305) is within average values for comparable stocks, (21.572). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.159) is also within normal values, averaging (2.498). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.154) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.397) is also within normal values, averaging (2.688).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. AMN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.
AAC | AMN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAC's Valuation (1) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (66) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that AAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
AAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that AAC’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's SMR Rating (54) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAC (91) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AAC (68) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AAC (42) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to AAC’s over the last 12 months.
| AAC | AMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 4% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 3% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while AMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAC’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AAC’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
- AMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -16.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.55%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.13% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-5.65% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
Advertisement
AAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AAC and TWLV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAC and TWLV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAC | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| TWLV - AAC | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| AMN - AAC | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| TWLVU - AAC | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCIC - AAC | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| VELO - AAC | 20% Poorly correlated | -18.87% | ||
More | ||||
AMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMN and USPH have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMN and USPH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| USPH - AMN | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CON - AMN | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| JYNT - AMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AAC - AMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| ADUS - AMN | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||