Advertisement
AAC vs AMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAC is a Hold and AMN is a Buy.
AAC | AMN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMN's Valuation (67) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AAC (85) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that AAC’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's SMR Rating (54) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAC (91) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AAC (56) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AAC (61) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to AAC’s over the last 12 months.
| AAC | AMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 3% | 12 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while AMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- AMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- AMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +3.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.84% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-3.76% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
Advertisement
AAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AAC and TWLV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAC and TWLV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| TWLV - AAC | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMN - AAC | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| TWLVU - AAC | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XRPNU - AAC | 21% Poorly correlated | +52.11% | ||
| HCIC - AAC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
AMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMN and CON have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMN and CON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| CON - AMN | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| USPH - AMN | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.65% | ||
| JYNT - AMN | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| AAC - AMN | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASTH - AMN | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||