Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where AAC declined for three days, in 1 of 29 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 3%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: AAC's P/B Ratio (-114876.414) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (-542.660). P/E Ratio (-99.700) is within average values for comparable stocks, (117.432). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (15.932). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.020) among similar stocks. AAC's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.158).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. AAC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. AAC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
AMN's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on October 22, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 162 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In 133 of the 162 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at 82%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 24, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AMN as a result. In 61 of 92 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
AMN moved above its 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for AMN crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +12.49% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AMN advanced for three days, in 222 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AMN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
AMN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AMN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.247) is normal, around the industry mean (204.132). P/E Ratio (15.812) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.957). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.159) is also within normal values, averaging (2.498). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.100) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.397) is also within normal values, averaging (2.688).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. AMN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 85, placing this stock worse than average.
AAC | AMN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAC's Valuation (1) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMN (73) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that AAC’s stock grew significantly faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
AAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that AAC’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's SMR Rating (54) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAC (91) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAC (69) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAC’s over the last 12 months.
AMN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AAC (38) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to AAC’s over the last 12 months.
| AAC | AMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 3% | 15 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while AMN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAC’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +17.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.44%.
AMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Hospital/Nursing Management (+1.24% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.