It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAGFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAGFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AAGFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.69% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
LZM is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
AAGFF | LZM | AAGFF / LZM | |
Capitalization | 34M | 628M | 5% |
EBITDA | -8.15M | -32.95M | 25% |
Gain YTD | 86.342 | -29.535 | -292% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 1250.00 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 2.32M | - |
Total Cash | 1M | 44.4M | 2% |
Total Debt | 292K | 496K | 59% |
AAGFF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAGFF | LZM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago89% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 12 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago89% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IMEGX | 19.91 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
Delaware Ivy Systematic Em Mkts Eq R6 | |||
SMINX | 11.24 | -0.04 | -0.35% |
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol F (SIMT) | |||
MDOEX | 10.31 | -0.07 | -0.67% |
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity I | |||
PLFSX | 29.11 | -0.39 | -1.32% |
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index R4 | |||
HISGX | 11.51 | -0.21 | -1.79% |
Harbor Small Cap Growth Inv |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAGFF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAGFF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAGFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AAGFF | 100% | +2.83% | ||
AGXPF - AAGFF | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.80% | ||
TECK - AAGFF | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
VZLA - AAGFF | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
EMX - AAGFF | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
GRSLF - AAGFF | 46% Loosely correlated | -9.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LZM and MTAL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZM and MTAL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LZM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LZM | 100% | -5.35% | ||
MTAL - LZM | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
AAGFF - LZM | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
VZLA - LZM | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
LITOF - LZM | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.34% | ||
IE - LZM | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.96% | ||
More |