Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAMAX vs ACRIX
AAMAX vs ACRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAMAX vs. ACRIX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMAX is a Hold and ACRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. AAMAX (56M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than AAMAX: ACRIX (0.51) vs AAMAX (0.00). AAMAX was incepted earlier than ACRIX: AAMAX (10 years) vs ACRIX (9 years). AAMAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). AAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). AAMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: AAMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). AAMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. ACRIX (-2.07). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.70 vs. AAMAX (18.67).
| AAMAX | ACRIX | AAMAX / ACRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.18 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.18 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.367 | 4.357 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56M | 1.36B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | -2.07 | -278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.44 | 20.25 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.67 | 33.70 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement