Ad is loading...
AAMAX vs PASCX
AAMAX vs PASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAMAX vs. PASCX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMAX is a Buy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. AAMAX (49.3M). PASCX pays higher dividends than AAMAX: PASCX (5.01) vs AAMAX (0.00). AAMAX was incepted earlier than PASCX: AAMAX (9 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than AAMAX (1.92). AAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. PASCX (56.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAMAX: PASCX (1000) vs AAMAX (2500). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.71 vs. AAMAX (-0.90). PASCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. AAMAX (15.88).
| AAMAX | PASCX | AAMAX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 3.06 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 3.15 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.755 | 2.555 | -147% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3M | 11.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 5.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | 5.71 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.57 | 5.33 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.88 | 37.18 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...