It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIOR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
AAMCF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.47% price change this week, while IOR (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.84%.
AAMCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2024.
IOR is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
AAMCF | IOR | AAMCF / IOR | |
Capitalization | 9.34M | 68.8M | 14% |
EBITDA | N/A | 8.61M | - |
Gain YTD | -69.807 | 26.866 | -260% |
P/E Ratio | 0.14 | 9.96 | 1% |
Revenue | N/A | 10.1M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 71K | - |
Total Debt | 10.6M | 9.58M | 111% |
AAMCF | IOR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AAMCF's Valuation (58) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOR (98) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that AAMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOR’s over the last 12 months.
IOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAMCF (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that IOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAMCF’s over the last 12 months.
IOR's SMR Rating (79) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as AAMCF (98) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that IOR’s stock grew similarly to AAMCF’s over the last 12 months.
IOR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as AAMCF (63) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that IOR’s stock grew similarly to AAMCF’s over the last 12 months.
IOR's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAMCF (96) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that IOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAMCF’s over the last 12 months.
AAMCF | IOR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago45% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago61% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AAMCF and EQS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAMCF and EQS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AAMCF | 100% | -7.41% | ||
EQS - AAMCF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DFS - AAMCF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
IOR - AAMCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FPAY - AAMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.36% | ||
ENVA - AAMCF | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IOR and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IOR and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IOR | 100% | N/A | ||
ECPG - IOR | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
CPSS - IOR | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
AAMCF - IOR | 22% Poorly correlated | -7.41% | ||
PRG - IOR | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
IX - IOR | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
More |