Ad is loading...
AAMCX vs ACRIX
AAMCX vs ACRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAMCX vs. ACRIX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMCX is a Buy and ACRIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. AAMCX (51.1M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than AAMCX: ACRIX (0.56) vs AAMCX (0.00). AAMCX was incepted earlier than ACRIX: AAMCX (9 years) vs ACRIX (9 years). AAMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). AAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). AAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: AAMCX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). AAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.32 vs. ACRIX (-5.88). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.12 vs. AAMCX (13.05).
| AAMCX | ACRIX | AAMCX / ACRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.18 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.18 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.056 | -2.656 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.1M | 1.27B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | -5.88 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | 10.97 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.05 | 32.12 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers