Ad is loading...
AAMMF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
JNCCF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

AAMMF vs JNCCF

Header iconAAMMF vs JNCCF Comparison
Open Charts AAMMF vs JNCCFBanner chart's image
Almadex Minerals
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$2.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Metalite Resources
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
AAMMF vs JNCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAMMF vs. JNCCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMMF is a Hold and JNCCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AAMMF: $0.11 vs. JNCCF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: AAMMF and JNCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAMMF: 13% vs. JNCCF: 66%
Market capitalization -- AAMMF: $13.11M vs. JNCCF: $1.1M
AAMMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.11M. JNCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJNCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JNCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JNCCF is a better buy in the long-term than AAMMF.

Price Growth

AAMMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -12.31% price change this week, while JNCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAMMF($13.1M) has a higher market cap than JNCCF($1.1M). AAMMF has higher P/E ratio than JNCCF: AAMMF (5.37) vs JNCCF (2.01). JNCCF YTD gains are higher at: -45.000 vs. AAMMF (-48.182). AAMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.44M vs. JNCCF (-5.98M). AAMMF has more cash in the bank: 19.5M vs. JNCCF (252K). AAMMF has higher revenues than JNCCF: AAMMF (5.56M) vs JNCCF (0).
AAMMFJNCCFAAMMF / JNCCF
Capitalization13.1M1.1M1,195%
EBITDA1.44M-5.98M-24%
Gain YTD-48.182-45.000107%
P/E Ratio5.372.01268%
Revenue5.56M0-
Total Cash19.5M252K7,738%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAMMF: Fundamental Ratings
AAMMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGLIX17.23-0.03
-0.17%
MFS Global Real Estate I
FMFCX92.64-0.67
-0.72%
Fidelity Advisor Materials C
VQNPX68.87-1.00
-1.43%
Vanguard Growth & Income Inv
JLGIX24.23-0.51
-2.06%
JAG Large Cap Growth I
THIGX35.61-0.77
-2.12%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth I

AAMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAMMF and JNCCF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAMMF and JNCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAMMF
1D Price
Change %
AAMMF100%
-8.80%
JNCCF - AAMMF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMNXF - AAMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OICT - AAMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRRF - AAMMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%
ACKRF - AAMMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
More

JNCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNCCF and AAMMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNCCF and AAMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNCCF
1D Price
Change %
JNCCF100%
N/A
AAMMF - JNCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.80%
OICT - JNCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDVXF - JNCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMLF - JNCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-14.03%
MDSMF - JNCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More