AAMMF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.01 (+3.03%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
13.11M
OICT
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.05 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAMMF vs OICT

Header iconAAMMF vs OICT Comparison
Open Charts AAMMF vs OICTBanner chart's image
Almadex Minerals
Price$0.34
Change+$0.01 (+3.03%)
Volume$50.83K
Capitalization13.11M
Oicintra
Price$10.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.50%)
Volume$185
CapitalizationN/A
AAMMF vs OICT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAMMF vs. OICT commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMMF is a StrongBuy and OICT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AAMMF: $0.34 vs. OICT: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: AAMMF and OICT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAMMF: 152% vs. OICT: 98%
Market capitalization -- AAMMF: $13.11M vs. OICT: $0
AAMMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.11M. OICT’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOICT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OICT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAMMF is a better buy in the long-term than OICT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAMMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OICT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAMMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OICT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAMMF is a better buy in the short-term than OICT.

Price Growth

AAMMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.89% price change this week, while OICT (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAMMF YTD gains are higher at: 183.250 vs. OICT (89.394).
AAMMFOICTAAMMF / OICT
Capitalization13.1MN/A-
EBITDA1.44MN/A-
Gain YTD183.25089.394205%
P/E Ratio5.37N/A-
Revenue5.56MN/A-
Total Cash19.5MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAMMF vs OICT: Fundamental Ratings
AAMMF
OICT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2797
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
76100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OICT's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AAMMF (87). This means that OICT’s stock grew significantly faster than AAMMF’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OICT (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OICT’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as OICT (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to OICT’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as OICT (40). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew similarly to OICT’s over the last 12 months.

AAMMF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OICT (100). This means that AAMMF’s stock grew significantly faster than OICT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMMFOICT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLVMF0.110.02
+16.41%
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
AHFCF0.52N/A
N/A
Flow Cap Corp.
JPNRF20.17N/A
N/A
Japan Airlines Co Ltd JAL
KNKZF74.80N/A
N/A
Kws Kleinwanzlebener Saatzucht AG
GHST0.05N/A
N/A
GHST World Inc.

AAMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAMMF and PMNXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAMMF and PMNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAMMF
1D Price
Change %
AAMMF100%
+3.00%
PMNXF - AAMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
OICT - AAMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRRF - AAMMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
ACKRF - AAMMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
AGXKF - AAMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OICT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OICT has been loosely correlated with BOCOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OICT jumps, then BOCOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OICT
1D Price
Change %
OICT100%
N/A
BOCOF - OICT
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PDIV - OICT
23%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
AAMMF - OICT
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
NVGLF - OICT
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
NSVLF - OICT
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More