Ad is loading...
AAOTX vs FFBQX
AAOTX vs FFBQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAOTX vs. FFBQX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAOTX is a Hold and FFBQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAOTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FFBQX (335M). FFBQX pays higher dividends than AAOTX: FFBQX (1.72) vs AAOTX (0.84). AAOTX was incepted earlier than FFBQX: AAOTX (5 years) vs FFBQX (6 years). AAOTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFBQX (0.30). FFBQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. AAOTX (4.00). FFBQX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAOTX: FFBQX (0) vs AAOTX (250). AAOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.75 vs. FFBQX (8.67). AAOTX (67.52) and FFBQX (65.10) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AAOTX | FFBQX | AAOTX / FFBQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.30 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.30 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.797 | 3.947 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 335M | 1,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.72 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.75 | 8.67 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.06 | 35.94 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.52 | 65.10 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...