It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBBW’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AAP (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.52% price change this week, while BBW (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.05%.
AAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
BBW is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
AAP | BBW | AAP / BBW | |
Capitalization | 5.07B | 427M | 1,187% |
EBITDA | 426M | 75.3M | 566% |
Gain YTD | -25.821 | 93.965 | -27% |
P/E Ratio | 170.86 | 8.54 | 2,000% |
Revenue | 11.3B | 470M | 2,404% |
Total Cash | 503M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 4B | 78.4M | 5,105% |
AAP | BBW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBW's Valuation (22) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AAP (23). This means that BBW’s stock grew similarly to AAP’s over the last 12 months.
BBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for AAP (100). This means that BBW’s stock grew significantly faster than AAP’s over the last 12 months.
BBW's SMR Rating (22) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAP (87). This means that BBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAP’s over the last 12 months.
BBW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AAP (56). This means that BBW’s stock grew similarly to AAP’s over the last 12 months.
AAP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BBW (12). This means that AAP’s stock grew similarly to BBW’s over the last 12 months.
AAP | BBW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago65% | 6 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FEBCX | 13.41 | -0.06 | -0.45% |
First Eagle Global Income Builder C | |||
MITJX | 39.77 | -0.20 | -0.50% |
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R6 | |||
FCUEX | 19.50 | -0.10 | -0.51% |
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class A | |||
LVAMX | 12.20 | -0.07 | -0.57% |
LSV US Managed Volatility Investor | |||
MGFNX | 9.21 | -0.08 | -0.86% |
MassMutual Global R3 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBW has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBW jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBW | 100% | +0.70% | ||
HNST - BBW | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
LE - BBW | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
CPRT - BBW | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
WINA - BBW | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
AAP - BBW | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
More |