Ad is loading...
AASCX vs FSMDX
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AASCX vs FSMDX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock A
Price$31.80
Change+$0.31 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.95B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.49
Change+$0.41 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.02B
AASCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AASCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AASCX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37B vs. AASCX (3.95B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AASCX: FSMDX (1.28) vs AASCX (0.28). AASCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AASCX (32 years) vs FSMDX (13 years). AASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSMDX (9.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AASCX: FSMDX (0) vs AASCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.18 vs. AASCX (11.72). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.07 vs. AASCX (34.71).
| AASCX | FSMDX | AASCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.743 | 3.879 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.95B | 37B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.28 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 20.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.42 | 23.42 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.71 | 60.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.82 | 122.46 | 44% |