AAUGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
NCMBF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

AAUGF vs NCMBF

Header iconAAUGF vs NCMBF Comparison
Open Charts AAUGF vs NCMBFBanner chart's image
AERO ENERGY
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Goldon Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.5K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AAUGF vs NCMBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
AAUGF vs. NCMBF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAUGF is a Hold and NCMBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AAUGF: $0.07 vs. NCMBF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AAUGF and NCMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAUGF: 20% vs. NCMBF: 179%
Market capitalization -- AAUGF: $1.08M vs. NCMBF: $1.03M
AAUGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.08M. NCMBF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAUGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCMBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAUGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAUGF is a better buy in the long-term than NCMBF.

Price Growth

AAUGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +97.14% price change this week, while NCMBF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAUGF($1.08M) and NCMBF($1.03M) have the same market capitalization . NCMBF YTD gains are higher at: 38.614 vs. AAUGF (-19.907). AAUGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.33M vs. NCMBF (-4.81M). AAUGF has more cash in the bank: 85.8K vs. NCMBF (35K). AAUGF (0) and NCMBF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AAUGFNCMBFAAUGF / NCMBF
Capitalization1.08M1.03M104%
EBITDA-1.33M-4.81M28%
Gain YTD-19.90738.614-52%
P/E Ratio1.22N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash85.8K35K245%
Total Debt14.4KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCMBF: Fundamental Ratings
NCMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

AAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAUGF and ALKEF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAUGF and ALKEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAUGF
1D Price
Change %
AAUGF100%
N/A
ALKEF - AAUGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLDF - AAUGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.05%
NCMBF - AAUGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORAAF - AAUGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVXFF - AAUGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NCMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCMBF and SKHRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCMBF and SKHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCMBF
1D Price
Change %
NCMBF100%
N/A
SKHRF - NCMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAUGF - NCMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDR - NCMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
NKOSF - NCMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
NSGCF - NCMBF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More