AB
Price
$39.70
Change
-$1.21 (-2.96%)
Updated
May 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.98B
70 days until earnings call
BLK
Price
$967.05
Change
+$7.87 (+0.82%)
Updated
May 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
124.17B
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AB vs BLK

Header iconAB vs BLK Comparison
Open Charts AB vs BLKBanner chart's image
AllianceBernstein Holding
Price$39.70
Change-$1.21 (-2.96%)
Volume$5.64K
Capitalization3.98B
Blackrock
Price$967.05
Change+$7.87 (+0.82%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization124.17B
AB vs BLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
AB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AB vs. BLK commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AB is a StrongBuy and BLK is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AB: $40.91 vs. BLK: $959.18)
Brand notoriety: AB and BLK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AB: 25% vs. BLK: 66%
Market capitalization -- AB: $3.98B vs. BLK: $124.17B
AB [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.98B. BLK’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $124.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BLK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than AB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BLK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than AB.

Price Growth

AB (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while BLK (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

AB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

BLK is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.87% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($124B) has a higher market cap than AB($3.98B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than AB: BLK (22.65) vs AB (14.71). AB YTD gains are higher at: 15.730 vs. BLK (-5.921). BLK has higher revenues than AB: BLK (17.9B) vs AB (300M).
ABBLKAB / BLK
Capitalization3.98B124B3%
EBITDAN/A7.87B-
Gain YTD15.730-5.921-266%
P/E Ratio14.7122.6565%
Revenue300M17.9B2%
Total CashN/A10.6B-
Total DebtN/A9.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AB vs BLK: Fundamental Ratings
AB
BLK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
10055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7432
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AB's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLK (88). This means that AB’s stock grew significantly faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that BLK’s stock grew significantly faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (55) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AB (100). This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

AB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (49). This means that AB’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AB (74). This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than AB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABBLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFQY140.500.70
+0.50%
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF
JPEF67.000.26
+0.39%
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
CADNZD1.22N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
YJUN23.73N/A
N/A
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bf ETF June
EUO30.15-0.55
-1.79%
ProShares UltraShort Euro

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
+0.12%
IVZ - BLK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
STT - BLK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
BN - BLK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
JHG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
BX - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More