It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABBV’s FA Score shows that 5 FA rating(s) are green whileGSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABBV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABBV (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while GSK (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.
ABBV is expected to report earnings on Oct 25, 2024.
GSK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
ABBV | GSK | ABBV / GSK | |
Capitalization | 322B | 88.1B | 365% |
EBITDA | 17.2B | 9.08B | 189% |
Gain YTD | 28.873 | 19.274 | 150% |
P/E Ratio | 66.46 | 14.01 | 474% |
Revenue | 54.3B | 30.3B | 179% |
Total Cash | 12.8B | 4.99B | 256% |
Total Debt | 59.4B | 18B | 330% |
ABBV | GSK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSK's Valuation (10) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as ABBV (18). This means that GSK’s stock grew similarly to ABBV’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSK (46). This means that ABBV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's SMR Rating (19) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GSK (34). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GSK (47). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GSK (36). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GSK’s over the last 12 months.
ABBV | GSK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago37% | 1 day ago35% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago46% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago47% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago39% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago47% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago47% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago61% | 6 days ago52% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago44% | 1 day ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago41% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago42% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABBV has been loosely correlated with PFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABBV jumps, then PFE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABBV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV | 100% | +0.10% | ||
PFE - ABBV | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
JNJ - ABBV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
GSK - ABBV | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
AMGN - ABBV | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
NVS - ABBV | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSK has been loosely correlated with NVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSK jumps, then NVS could also see price increases.