ABL vs QAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a Hold and QAT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ABL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +6.71% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABL is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-2.87% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| ABL | QAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 80% |
ABL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and AFARU have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and AFARU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABL | 100% | -3.05% | ||
| AFARU - ABL | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOC - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -17.28% | ||
| GBBK - ABL | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRAC - ABL | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GATEU - ABL | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
QAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QAT | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
| ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.05% |