Ad is loading...
ABTFX vs CXHYX
ABTFX vs CXHYX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs CXHYX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$10.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.49B
ABTFX vs CXHYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. CXHYX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and CXHYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. ABTFX (2.7B). CXHYX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: CXHYX (4.76) vs ABTFX (3.29). ABTFX was incepted earlier than CXHYX: ABTFX (15 years) vs CXHYX (39 years). ABTFX (1.96) is less costly to investors than CXHYX (0.87). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CXHYX (19.00). CXHYX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: CXHYX (1000) vs ABTFX (2500). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.87 vs. CXHYX (0.15). CXHYX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. ABTFX (8.48).
| ABTFX | CXHYX | ABTFX / CXHYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.85 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.87 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.648 | -2.798 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 3.49B | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 4.76 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 0.15 | 585% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | 5.36 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.48 | 10.17 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.63 | 23.03 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...