Ad is loading...
ABTFX vs CXHYX
ABTFX vs CXHYX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs CXHYX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$10.46
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99B
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$10.29
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
ABTFX vs CXHYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. CXHYX commentary
Feb 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and CXHYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. ABTFX (2.99B). CXHYX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: CXHYX (4.48) vs ABTFX (3.11). ABTFX was incepted earlier than CXHYX: ABTFX (15 years) vs CXHYX (38 years). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CXHYX (18.00). CXHYX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: CXHYX (1000) vs ABTFX (2500). CXHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. ABTFX (3.83). CXHYX return over 5 years is better than : 0.12 vs. ABTFX (-2.64).
| ABTFX | CXHYX | ABTFX / CXHYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.873 | 1.263 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 3.69B | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 4.48 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 5.26 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.11 | -2.13 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.64 | 0.12 | -2,131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.02 | 26.75 | 49% |