Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHMFX
ABTFX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHMFX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$9.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.99
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
ABTFX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHMFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. ABTFX (2.73B). NHMFX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHMFX (5.67) vs ABTFX (3.44). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: ABTFX (15 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). ABTFX (1.96) and NHMFX (1.87) have similar cost to investors . NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ABTFX (23.00). ABTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: ABTFX (2500) vs NHMFX (1000000). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.85 vs. NHMFX (-3.71). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.35 vs. ABTFX (2.36).
| ABTFX | NHMFX | ABTFX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.87 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.87 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.234 | -3.272 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 13.4B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 5.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | -3.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.11 | 8.99 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.36 | 8.35 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement