ABTS
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.03 (+6.12%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
CLSK
Price
$8.09
Change
-$0.50 (-5.82%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ABTS vs CLSK

Header iconABTS vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts ABTS vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Abits Group
Price$0.52
Change+$0.03 (+6.12%)
Volume$2.96K
CapitalizationN/A
CleanSpark
Price$8.09
Change-$0.50 (-5.82%)
Volume$17.61M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ABTS vs CLSK Comparison Chart
Loading...
ABTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ABTS vs. CLSK commentary
Sep 08, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTS is a Hold and CLSK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2024
Stock price -- (ABTS: $0.49 vs. CLSK: $8.59)
Brand notoriety: ABTS and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABTS: 32% vs. CLSK: 70%
Market capitalization -- ABTS: $25.57M vs. CLSK: $4.78B
ABTS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $25.57M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABTS is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABTS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than ABTS.

Price Growth

ABTS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -20.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABTS is expected to report earnings on Dec 30, 2022.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.61% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than ABTS($25.6M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: -22.121 vs. ABTS (-56.662).
ABTSCLSKABTS / CLSK
Capitalization25.6M4.78B1%
EBITDAN/A60.4M-
Gain YTD-56.662-22.121256%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A216M-
Total CashN/A176M-
Total DebtN/A15.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABTS vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
ABTS
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6256
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLSK's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as ABTS (90) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABTS’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ABTS (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABTS’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ABTS (97) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABTS’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as ABTS (85) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ABTS’s over the last 12 months.

ABTS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (84) in the null industry. This means that ABTS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABTSCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ABTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEMB37.540.23
+0.62%
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF
LTL66.350.17
+0.26%
ProShares Ultra Communication Services
LRNZ35.22-0.14
-0.41%
TrueShares Tech, AI and Deep Lrng ETF
KOMP46.47-0.23
-0.49%
SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF
CVY25.70-0.17
-0.67%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF

ABTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABTS and BTCS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABTS and BTCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABTS
1D Price
Change %
ABTS100%
+0.20%
BTCS - ABTS
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CLSK - ABTS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
CMCM - ABTS
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
MARA - ABTS
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.85%
YY - ABTS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More