Advertisement
CLSK vs WULF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. TeraWulf (WULF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CLSK and WULF are Bitcoin miners expanding into high-performance computing (HPC) and AI data centers, leveraging sustainable energy sources amid volatile crypto markets.
- WULF shows stronger recent momentum with YTD gains over 50% and analyst targets suggesting 25% upside, driven by HPC pivots and renewable focus.
- CLSK trades at a lower forward P/E (around 12) with solid revenue growth to $181 million in recent quarters, but faces earnings pressure and higher volatility.
- Tickeron AI bots favor WULF strategies with up to 279% annualized returns versus 200% for CLSK, due to better capture of AI catalysts.
- Both stocks exhibit high betas (over 4), tying performance to Bitcoin prices and sector shifts toward AI infrastructure.
- Recent expansions in Texas data centers position both for multi-gigawatt AI/HPC growth, balancing mining risks.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CLSK (CleanSpark, Inc.) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.), two leading Bitcoin mining companies increasingly diversifying into sustainable data centers for high-performance computing (HPC) and artificial intelligence (AI) workloads. Both operate in the volatile digital asset mining sector, where low-cost, renewable energy and infrastructure scalability drive competitive edges. Traders seeking exposure to cryptocurrency trends alongside emerging AI infrastructure opportunities, as well as long-term investors eyeing sector consolidation and revenue diversification, will find this analysis relevant for assessing relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning in the current environment.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) is a bitcoin mining company that owns and operates data centers powered by sustainable energy sources across the Americas. In recent market activity, the stock has navigated volatility, trading around $10.20 with a 52-week range of $6.51 to $23.61 and a market cap of approximately $2.6 billion. YTD performance stands at about 0.79%, reflecting broader crypto sector pressures, though 1-year returns exceed 33%. Key influences include a $100 million Bitcoin-backed bond issuance to fund expansions and a shift from quarterly to a one-time special dividend, which contributed to a 5.5% dip in recent weeks. The company reported $181 million in Q1 revenue, bolstering its balance sheet amid operational updates showing hashrate peaks near 50 EH/s (exahashes per second, a measure of mining computational power) and Bitcoin holdings over 13,000 BTC. Texas land and power deals for up to 600 MW data centers signal AI/HPC ambitions, supporting sentiment despite projected quarterly losses of $0.25 per share.
WULF Overview and Recent Performance
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities and digital infrastructure using clean, low-cost energy, with a growing emphasis on HPC hosting. The stock has demonstrated robust momentum in recent weeks, trading near $19 with a 52-week range of $2.06 to $19.50 and a market cap around $6.3 billion. YTD returns surpass 57%, with 1-year gains over 698%, outperforming broader indices amid Bitcoin strength. Positive analyst sentiment persists, with targets implying 25% upside to $22.10 and consensus "Strong Buy" ratings. Developments include WULF Compute lender updates for AI expansions, Q4 2025 results highlighting revenue growth to $168 million TTM (trailing twelve months), and site buildouts like Abernathy for 168 MW initial HPC load. Despite high debt levels near $5.2 billion and net losses, renewable mining focus and AI pivots have fueled investor interest and volume spikes.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page (Trending AI Robots) curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 351 agents, spotlighting more than 25 bots best suited to prevailing market conditions like volatility in semiconductors, energy, and AI sectors. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns from 12% to 153%, win rates up to 87%, and profit factors reaching 11.45, across strategies like swing trading, trend following, hedging, and multi-agent setups on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. They trade thousands of tickers with diverse styles—technical analysis (TA), fundamental analysis (FA), long/short pairs, and risk controls like 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors—outperforming benchmarks such as SPY in recent periods. Traders can explore these for copy trading signals tailored to current dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark (CLSK) and TeraWulf (WULF) share Bitcoin mining roots but diverge in diversification pace: WULF leads in HPC/AI pivots with partnerships and 510 MW+ contracted load, versus CLSK's focus on mining efficiency (50 EH/s) and Texas expansions. Growth drivers favor WULF's projected 80% 2026 revenue jump to $400 million, though CLSK boasts higher absolute scale ($1.1 billion). Recent momentum tilts to WULF (57% YTD vs. 1%), but CLSK offers lower forward P/E (12 vs. 17-30). Risks include high betas (4+), debt burdens (WULF $5.2B vs. $1.8B), and Bitcoin halvings; both expose to crypto but WULF hedges via HPC. Sentiment leans bullish on WULF for AI catalysts, per analysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors WULF over CLSK, citing superior trend consistency from HPC diversification, stronger relative momentum (e.g., 57% YTD), and catalysts like AI expansions amid Bitcoin volatility. AI bots achieve higher returns (up to 279% annualized) and Sharpe ratios on WULF, reflecting better positioning for multi-sector growth. While CLSK offers value via scale and efficiency, WULF shows probabilistic edge in stability and upside potential.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and WULF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WULF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
WULF is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| CLSK | WULF | CLSK / WULF | |
| Capitalization | 4.17B | 13.4B | 31% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | -761.51M | 9% |
| Gain YTD | 69.911 | 150.479 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 740M | 168M | 440% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 2.63B | 36% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 5.31B | 34% |
CLSK | WULF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (94). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.
WULF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (91). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.
WULF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (37). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
WULF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | 100% | +1.66% | ||
| CIFR - WULF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| HUT - WULF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| CLSK - WULF | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| RIOT - WULF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| COIN - WULF | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.04% | ||
More | ||||