Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYAX vs LFMAX
ABYAX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYAX vs. LFMAX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYAX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYAX has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. LFMAX (1.54B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than ABYAX: LFMAX (2.97) vs ABYAX (1.78). ABYAX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: ABYAX (11 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). LFMAX (2.13) and ABYAX (2.10) have similar cost to investors . LFMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYAX (0.00). ABYAX (6%) and LFMAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ABYAX (2500) and LFMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.62 vs. ABYAX (-10.41). ABYAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.98 vs. LFMAX (5.52).
| ABYAX | LFMAX | ABYAX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.13 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.13 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.113 | -1.440 | 425% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 1.54B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -3.62 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.56 | -13.65 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.98 | 5.52 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.69 | 10.65 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement