Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYCX vs LFMAX
ABYCX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. LFMAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.45B vs. LFMAX (1.54B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than ABYCX: LFMAX (2.94) vs ABYCX (0.98). ABYCX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: ABYCX (10 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). ABYCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). LFMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYCX (0.00). ABYCX (2500) and LFMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.30 vs. ABYCX (-11.41). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.57 vs. ABYCX (4.42).
| ABYCX | LFMAX | ABYCX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.13 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 2.13 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.798 | -1.047 | 554% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 1.54B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 2.94 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.41 | -4.30 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.53 | -12.66 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.42 | 5.57 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers