Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABYCX vs LFMAX
ABYCX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABYCX vs. LFMAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABYCX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABYCX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. LFMAX (1.54B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than ABYCX: LFMAX (2.97) vs ABYCX (0.98). ABYCX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: ABYCX (10 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). ABYCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). LFMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. ABYCX (0.00). ABYCX (2500) and LFMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.76 vs. ABYCX (-9.53). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.04 vs. ABYCX (5.33).
| ABYCX | LFMAX | ABYCX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.13 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 2.13 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.418 | -1.309 | 414% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 1.54B | 161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 2.97 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.53 | -2.76 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.66 | -14.17 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.33 | 6.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement